What Is the Speed of a Mass at Equilibrium in Simple Harmonic Motion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a 1.0 kg mass at the equilibrium position in simple harmonic motion, attached to a vertical spring with a force constant of 400 N/m and an amplitude of 10 cm. Participants clarify that at equilibrium, the acceleration is zero and the velocity is at its maximum. The conservation of energy equation is applied, where the initial energy equals the final energy, specifically referencing the position relative to the equilibrium point. It is confirmed that the equation is valid for vertical springs as long as the position is measured from the equilibrium position. The conversation concludes with an understanding that the principles of energy conservation apply in this context.
Soniteflash
Messages
36
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A 1.0 Kg mass is attached to the end of a vertical ideal spring with a force constant of 400 N/m. The mass is set in simple harmonic motion with an amplitude of 10 cm. The speed of the 1.0 kg mass at the equilibrium position is.

A. 2 m/s
B. 4 m/s
C. 20 m/s
D. 40 m/s
E. 200 m/s

Homework Equations


EI= EF

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that at equilibrium the acceleration is zero and that velocity is max.
So using conservation of energy I thought this:
EI= EF
(1/2) k x2 = (1/2) m v2

I have a feeling that this equation does not apply because the spring is vertical
For vertical springs all I know is that the equilibrium position at which the mass simply hangs and does not move.

So at equilibrium the the amount of force required to keep it in equilibrium is
k yeq = mg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation does apply as long as you are referencing x to the equilibrium position.
 
  • Like
Likes Soniteflash
paisiello2 said:
The equation does apply as long as you are referencing x to the equilibrium position.
Ah, Ok that makes sense then.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top