What is the speed of a wedge sliding down an inclined plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Identity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Sliding
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the speed of a wedge sliding down an inclined plane when a mass m slides down it. Initially, a kinematics approach was attempted, yielding an incorrect formula for speed. The participant then considered using conservation of energy but struggled with dividing the speeds of the particle and the wedge. A suggestion was made to apply conservation of momentum due to the absence of external forces in the horizontal direction. This prompted a realization that momentum conservation could lead to the correct solution.
Identity
Messages
151
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A point particle of mass m is sliding down a wedge inclined at an angle of \alpha to the horizontal. The wedge has a mass m and is free to slide on a smooth horizontal surface. When the mass has fallen a height h, what will be the speed of the wedge?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried a kinematics approach with a lot of angle-bashing and eventually came up with:

v = \frac{h}{g^2} \cot \alpha

But this is wrong, and I have a feeling this is too complex for kinematics

I've thought about a conservation of energy approach with

mgh = \frac{1}{2}mu^2+\frac{1}{2}mv^2

where 'u' is the speed of the particle and 'v' is the speed of the block, but I don't know how to divde up the speeds!

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried the conservation of momentum? There's no external forces in the x direction, so horizontal momentum must be conserved.
 
Thanks, I hadn't considered conservation of momentum, I think I've got it now
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top