What is the Spring Constant for Question 9?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cummings
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of the spring constant and displacement in a physics problem. A participant calculated a displacement of 3.2 mm for a racket, while the textbook states it should be 2.2 mm, leading to confusion. The calculations involve kinetic energy and work done, with energy equating to the area under the force-displacement graph. Another participant emphasizes the importance of the spring constant, suggesting that the slope of the force versus displacement graph is crucial for accurate calculations. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on the scaling of force and the correct interpretation of the spring constant.
Cummings
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
http://cummingsiam.steven-sst.com/argh.jpg

question 8 is similar to my last forces question. I got 3.2mm displacement for the raquet - yet the book says 2.2
The only difference i see is that the ball rebounds at 9.5ms-1 and instead of compression - we have displacement. Its the same thing...

question 9 is damnright confusing..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you go about getting 3.2mm? Please post your work so we can check where your (or the book's) mistake is.

For the second one, remember Work = Force * distance. You'll need to do a few simple integrations.
 
well,

the speed the ball is traveling is 10ms-1
the rule for kinetic energy is .5 * mass * velocity squared.
so .5 * .1 * 100
= 5j of energy

now, work done is measured in jouls.. and can be measured as the area under the force displacement graph.
so 5j = .5 * force * displacement.
if we let X = force and displacement
5j = .5Xsquared
10 = X squared
X = 3.2 mm displacement.

i let X = both force and displacement as if i change the scale of the force..X can equal both sides.

i get 3.2mm..the book says 2.2
 
"if we let X = force and displacement"?

I don't know what you mean by "scale the force". What scale are you using? That should depend on the "spring constant"- the slope of the Force versus displacement graph. Unfortunately, I was unable to open your link to find that. What is the slope of the graph?
You should be able to write the force as k*X, reading k from the graph.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top