What is the stability proof for a PI controller in a formation flying system?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the stability proof for a proportional integral (PI) controller used in a formation flying system with two satellites affected by differential drag. The user seeks assistance in proving the stability of their controller, which aims to maintain the satellites' formation by minimizing the along-track position error. Suggestions include exploring Ragazzini's method for guaranteed performance and analyzing the system's pole locations in the s-plane through locus plots. Understanding the relationship between pole locations and stability requires knowledge of ordinary differential equations (ODE) and Laplace transforms. The conversation emphasizes the importance of stability analysis in nonlinear systems.
fernandoz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have two satellites flying in formation geverned by the equations of motion including J2 and drag. Now, one of the satellites has more drag than the other so they become appart. I designed a controller (proportional integral) which meassures the along track position between them and gives Thrust values so the error, which is the difference in the along ttrack position between different orbits, will be zero (that means they will still fly in formation)
I have to give a stability proof for the controller, someone can help me? (the equations governing the system are nonlinear, of course).

thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are various techniques to design a controller. If you want guaranteed performance try searching for Ragazzini's method and of course I'm assuming you are trying to design a discrete controller.
 
Last edited:
If you insists on using a PI controller to see if it's stable you'll have to get the locus plot of the system (plant + controller) and see where the poles are located in the s-plane.

If you are puzzled as to why the poles' locations determine stability then you'll have to study ODE (as a good starting point) and its connection to Laplace transform.
 
Last edited:
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top