What Is the Steady-State Solution for This Heat Conduction Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the steady-state solution for a heat conduction problem defined by specific boundary conditions. The user is attempting to solve the equation ∂²u/∂x² = ∂u/∂t using separation of variables, leading to the equations X'' + βX = 0 and T' + ∂²βT' = 0. They derive that C2 must equal zero, resulting in X(x) = C1cos(√(β)x). The user expresses confusion about applying the boundary conditions and whether integration of the steady-state solution is necessary, noting that the textbook examples do not include this step. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying boundary conditions in heat conduction problems.
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement




In each of Problems 1 through 8 find the steady-state solution of the heat conduction equation ∂2uxx=ut that satisfieds that given set of boundary problems.

...

3. ux(0,t)=0, u(L,t)=0

Homework Equations



Assume u(x,t)=X(x)T(t)


The Attempt at a Solution



2X'' T = X T'

X'' / X = (1/∂2) T' / T = -ß

X'' + ßX = 0,
T + ∂2ßT' = 0.

Since ux(0,t)=0 and u(x,t)=X(x)T(t),

X'(0)T(t)=0 ---> X'(0)=0.

Solving X'' + ßX = 0 like a I would any differential equation,

X(x) = C1cos(√(ß)x) + C2sin(√(ß)x)

--->

X'(x) = -√(ß)C1sin(√(ß)x) + √(ß)C2(cos(√(ß)x)

--->

X'(0)=0= 0 + √(ß)C2 ---> C2=0

--->

X(x) = C1cos(√(ß)x).

Also, u(L,t)=0 ---> X(L)T(t)=0 ---> X(L)=0.

I'm getting somewhere, right?

Since we're talking about a steady-state solution being reached, some function of t and possibly x will disappear, leaving us with just a function v(x) that shows the temperature at any place in the rod.

u(x,t) = v(x) + w(x,t),

limt-->∞ u(x,t) = v(x)


...


Anyhow, I'm sort of stuck. Problem 1 was was easy because it gave me u(0,t)=T1, u(L,t)=T2, just like the examples in the chapter; but this one is throwing me off with the ux(0,t). I'm having trouble putting the pieces together.

Please help, geniuses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At steady state, \partial T/\partial t=0. Why not just integrate \partial^2 T/\partial x^2=0 twice and apply the boundary conditions? Or are you required to use separation of variables?
 
Mapes said:
At steady state, \partial T/\partial t=0. Why not just integrate \partial^2 T/\partial x^2=0 twice and apply the boundary conditions? Or are you required to use separation of variables?

Hmmmmm ... In the textbook example it never has us integrate T''(t)=0 when solving these problems. It does say, however:

Since v(x) must satisfy the equation of the heat equation ß2uxx=ut, we have

v''(x)=0, 0<x<L.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top