What is the structure of FOOOF and FOOOOF?

  • Thread starter Thread starter etotheipi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the existence and structure of exotic compounds like FOOF and its derivatives, with references to the book "Ignition: An informal history of liquid rocket propellants." It highlights the instability of FOOF, which decomposes at around -160°C and is known for its highly flammable properties. Participants express skepticism about the stability of these compounds at standard temperature and pressure (STP) and discuss the challenges of determining their structures. Suggestions for exploring these compounds include matrix isolation spectroscopy, which involves preparing the compounds in situ with an inert gas like argon and using infrared spectroscopy to deduce their structures. The conversation also touches on the use of computational methods, such as ab initio programs like Gaussian, to analyze IR spectra and identify molecular structures. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexity and risks associated with working with these highly reactive substances.
etotheipi
FOOF looks like this:

1606942855543.png


This paper suggests that FOOOF also exists but does not give a structure, although it does state that it's unlikely it takes the F-O-O-O-F structure. "Ignition: An informal history of liquid rocket propellants" claims that this series of compounds, up to FOOOOOOF, can exist.

How can we go about finding the structure of these more exotic species? Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hmm. I do not know a resource, but I do not implicitly trust some of what you cited. Stability comes to mind. Are these odd molecules supposed to be stable at STP? Or do they require extreme cold? This:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dioxygen_difluoride (where you got your diagram)

says FOOF decomposes at ~(-160°C) Not exactly a kitchen friendly compound.
And it is named for its ability to oxidize and burst into flame almost with anything - it is onomatopoetic 'FOOF' for instant flammability.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
etotheipi said:
"Ignition: An informal history of liquid rocket propellants" claims that this series of compounds, up to FOOOOOOF, can exist.
jim mcnamara said:
And it is named for its ability to oxidize and burst into flame almost with anything - it is onomatopoetic 'FOOF' for instant flammability.
Um, @etotheipi what are you building in your dorm room? :oops:

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/content/dam/magazine/rights-exempt/2018/09/pr-rockets/rockets-launch-black-rock-desert-nevada-7.ngsversion.1534392082215.adapt.1900.1.jpg

1606956245279.png
 
  • Haha
Likes etotheipi
shhhhh, if college finds out they'll increase my rent! 🤭
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
etotheipi said:
How can we go about finding the structure of these more exotic species?

The short answer is, you don't unless you have a really, really, really pressing need to, something like a war, and even then you think twice. I suggest reading the Derek Lowe article that @TeethWhitener linked to. Of course, if you've read the "Ignition" book, you have already read hair-raising descriptions of such attempts.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and etotheipi
PeterDonis said:
I suggest reading the Derek Lowe article that @TeethWhitener linked to.

You might also want to check out the link there to Lowe's article on chlorine trifluoride, which features a priceless quote from the "Ignition" book's discussion of that substance.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
More to the point:
https://atct.anl.gov/Thermochemical Data/version 1.122/species/?species_number=935#ref_4
I’ve never personally worked with any of these compounds, but if I were going to try to determine their structure, I’d probably try to perform some sort of matrix isolation spectroscopy on them:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_isolation
Prepare the oxygen fluorides in situ, co-deposit them with argon on a cold finger and do IR spectroscopy. The matrix may perturb the system, but it’s a heck of a lot safer than anything else I can think of off the top of my head.
 
  • Informative
Likes etotheipi
  • #10
That's cool, haven't heard of that technique before! If I understand correctly, you'd prepare the compound you want to do the IR spec on in situ along with an excess of an inert gas like argon (which is also optically transparent), and then cool the whole thing so that the the argon forms a solid host matrix in which the compound is embedded?

And then, you'd somehow use the vibrational IR absorptions to deduce the structure? I've only covered quite basic IR spec, e.g. different types of stretches, rocking, wagging, that sort of thing (for common functional groups), but I don't know how complicated it is to try and recreate a molecule like this from the spectrum.
 
  • #11
etotheipi said:
If I understand correctly, you'd prepare the compound you want to do the IR spec on in situ along with an excess of an inert gas like argon (which is also optically transparent), and then cool the whole thing so that the the argon forms a solid host matrix in which the compound is embedded?
Yes.
etotheipi said:
And then, you'd somehow use the vibrational IR absorptions to deduce the structure? I've only covered quite basic IR spec, e.g. different types of stretches, rocking, wagging, that sort of thing (for common functional groups), but I don't know how complicated it is to try and recreate a molecule like this from the spectrum.
In practice, you’d throw the structure (or several candidate structures) into an ab initio program like Gaussian and calculate the IR spectrum, then compare it with the observed IR spectrum.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
  • #12
TeethWhitener said:
In practice, you’d throw the structure (or several candidate structures) into an ab initio program like Gaussian and calculate the IR spectrum, then compare it with the observed IR spectrum.

Oh yeah! I forgot that professional chemists don't waste time assigning spectra by hand 😜

Thanks!
 
Back
Top