What is the sum of the Fourier series for g(x) at x = pi/2 and x = 3pi/2?

nicolayh
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The function g(x) is defined as follows:

g(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{rcl}<br /> {-\pi e^x} &amp; \mbox{for}<br /> &amp; -\pi &lt; x &lt; 0 \\<br /> {\pi e^{ -x}} &amp; \mbox{for} &amp; 0 &lt; x &lt; \pi<br /> \end{array}\right.

And the Fourier series for g(x) is as follows:

<br /> <br /> \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{2n}{n^2+1}(1 - (-1)^n e^{-\pi})\sin{nx}<br /> <br />

What is the sum of this series given x = \frac{\pi}{2} and x = \frac{3\pi}{2}?


The Attempt at a Solution



We've tried googeling, adressing the textbook on the subject (Kreyzig's Advanced Engineering Mathematics), but have yet to find a solution to this problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming the Fourier transform is correct, your function g(x) is continuous at x=pi/2. Can't you find the sum of the series by finding the value of g(pi/2)? Your other value is outside the range of definition of g(x) but your transform should converge to a periodic extension of g(x), right?
 
Thank you very much! :)

We managed to get the first one right (pi/2) by simply inserting the value into the function as suggested.

However, we are a bit more puzzeled about the second part of the task. How do we go about finding that periodic extension of g(x)? (and how do we show that the Fourier series converges to it?
 
Since the Fourier series for g involves only sines, g is an odd function: that is it is extended exactly as it is with period 2\pi.

For x between \pi and 2\pi, g(x)= -\pi e^x.
 
We get it now, thank you both very much! :D
 
HallsofIvy said:
Since the Fourier series for g involves only sines, g is an odd function: that is it is extended exactly as it is with period 2\pi.

For x between \pi and 2\pi, g(x)= -\pi e^x.

Surely you don't mean that. It is an appropriate translation of -\pi e^x to the new interval.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top