What Is the Surface Area of a Sphere Inside a Paraboloid?

jaredmt
Messages
120
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the area of the sphere x^2 + y^2 + (z-2)^2 = 4 that lies inside paraboloid z = x^2 + y^2

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



when i take the equation of the spere and replace x^2 + y^2 with z i get: z(z-3) = 0
so they intersect at the plane z = 3.

were supposed to use the double integration rule. I am not sure what the parameters would be. when i convert to polar, i know feta is from 0 to 2pie. i tried making r from 0 to 3 but i got the wrong answer. idk whether i integraded the wrong equation or used the wrong parameters or both
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How are we supposed to know what you did wrong if you won't tell us what you did. What did you integrate? What did you get?
 
i don't know how to type the integration symbols

the double integral was ||Rx X Ry||
where x = x, y = y, z = x^2 + y^2

so basically (skipping some steps) the integral becomes: (1 + 4x^2 + 4y^2)^.5
which becomes: r(1 + 4r^2)^.5 when put in polar form
and like i said, i tried 0<feta<2pi and 0<r<3

i got like pi/6 * some quantity. but its supposed to be 4pi
 
It looks like you are finding the area of the paraboloid that lies in the sphere. The question asks for the area of the sphere that lies inside the paraboloid. It's the upper cap of the sphere.
 
You might also notice z=r^2 on the paraboloid. The limits for z are 0->3. The limits for r are not 0->3.
 
Hi jaredmt! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a pi: π and a squared: ² and an integral: ∫)
jaredmt said:
when i take the equation of the spere and replace x^2 + y^2 with z i get: z(z-3) = 0
so they intersect at the plane z = 3.

That's right! :smile:

So you're now trying to find the area of a cap of a sphere of radius 2 from "height" 2 to "height" 1 (and you're told to use ∫∫).
were supposed to use the double integration rule. I am not sure what the parameters would be.

Hint: you can use either x and y parameters, or latitude and longitude parameters.

They both work (well, why wouldn't they? :rolleyes:), so you may as well try both of them! :smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top