What is the Tension in the Left Cable Holding a 2000 Pound Block at 30 Degrees?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cassie1014
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cable Tension
AI Thread Summary
To determine the tension in the left cable holding a 2000-pound block at a 30-degree angle, start by analyzing the forces acting on the block, which is in equilibrium. A free body diagram should be drawn to illustrate the tension forces in both cables, labeled T1 and T2. Apply Newton's law, noting that the sum of forces equals zero due to equilibrium, and resolve T1 and T2 into their x and y components. Set up two equations based on the x and y components of the forces to solve for the tensions. This approach will yield the tension in the left cable accurately.
Cassie1014
I can't figure this out for the life of me .

A large, 2000 pound block is being held by two ropes that were attached to a horizontal beam. The rope on the left made a 30 degree angle, the rope on the right made a 40 degree angle (see image). What is the tension in the left cable?

HINT: Round to the nearest whole number. Do not enter units.

math.gif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by labeling all the forces acting on the block. Hint: Since the block is in equilibrium, what can you say about the net force on it?
 
Maybe you should replace the block by a single black dot at the point of intersection of the ropes. What forces are the block experiencing from the ropes and in which directions are these forces? Can you think of any other forces acting on the block?
 
1) Draw a free body diagram showing the tension forces in both strings: call them T1 and T2 if you want.
2) Write down Newton's law -> Sum of forces = ma; since this object is in equilibrium though, sum of forces = 0.
3) Resolve T1 and T2 into their respective x and y components, and then apply Newton's law to each component...
e.g. T2X - T1X = 0 where T1X and T2X and the x-components of T1 and T2 respectively..
Then you'll have two equations in two unknowns; use your knowledge of linear systems to solve for them and you'll be fine. :D
 
A Classic in Statics :!) . Hehe 2 eqs, 2 unknowns.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top