What is the trick to solving this baffling circuit problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sys.fail
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The circuit problem involves resistors of 4 ohms and batteries with an emf of 4 V, and the goal is to find the current through resistor R. Using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, the solution involves tracing a specific loop in the circuit. By summing the voltages and setting up the equation, it is determined that the current I equals 2A. The key insight is to find a loop that includes only the relevant batteries and the resistor. This approach simplifies the problem and avoids unnecessary complexity.
sys.fail
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In the figure provided, all the resistors have a resistance of 4 ohms and all the ideal batteries have an emf of 4 V. What is the current through resistor R?

This question had me baffled for a while, I can't quite trace through the circut. Even my physics teacher got lost with the unbelievable loops in the circut. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • MCircut.gif
    MCircut.gif
    3.2 KB · Views: 551
Physics news on Phys.org
ANYONE? Come on, this can't be that hard.
 
I think it's 2A.
Use Kirchoff's Voltage Law.
Start at the junction below the lower-left battery.
Travel up to the upper left corner, passing along three batteries along the way.
Then travel right to the battery near the right-side, passing it "backwards".
Then travel to your resistor, then down to the bottom wire, which is
equivalent to your starting point.

(+4V) + (+4V) + (+4V) + (-4V) + (-IR) = 0
or
(+8V)=IR... so I=(8 V)/R = (8 V)/(4 ohms)= 2A.
 
Aha! I knew there had to be a trick! Here I was starting to set up a 19 x 19 matrix. After bogging down in all the junctions I thought I'd just wait for the answer to show up. So, to summarize: find a loop that only passes through the batteries and the resistor that you want, eh? Brilliant! I love it!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top