What is the vacuum wavelength of the incident light in nm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NeedsHelp1212
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the vacuum wavelength of light incident on a soap film with a refractive index of 1.33, where the second smallest film thickness for destructive interference is 296 nm. The equation used for destructive interference is 2t + 1/2 lambda = m lambda, leading to a calculated wavelength in the medium of 395 nm. To find the vacuum wavelength, the medium wavelength must be multiplied by the refractive index, resulting in a final calculation of approximately 526 nm. The confusion primarily stemmed from distinguishing between the wavelength in the medium and the vacuum wavelength. The participants clarified the relationship between the two wavelengths and confirmed the correct approach to the problem.
NeedsHelp1212
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When monochromatic light shines perpendicularly on a soap film (n = 1.33) with air on each side, the second smallest nonzero film thickness for which destructive interference of reflected light is observed is 296 nm. What is the vacuum wavelength of the light in nm?



Homework Equations



My teacher gave me this equation for destructive interference, it seems to differ from others but I am going to go with it: 2t + 1/2 lambda = (m) (lambda)



The Attempt at a Solution



2 (296) + 1/2 lambda = 2 lambda
592 + 1/2 lambda = 2 lambda
592= 1.5 lambda
lambda= 395 nm

The question asks what is the wavelength in the vacuum. I am confused? Did i just solve for the wavelength in the vacuum or for the wavelength in the medium? Because if its for the medium i know i would do n = lambda vac/ lambda med. So lambda vac = lambda med times n = 395 * 1.333

Im not sure what to do... please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's the logic: For destructive interference, there are n+1/2 wavelengths along the path in the medium, where n is an integer. The path is twice the thickness, so the equation is:
2t = (n+1/2) lambda.

Your prof's equation is the same except that his m is one bigger than my n.

The thinnest film has n=0. The one you want has n=1.

That lambda is the one in the medium, so indeed, you have to convert to the free space wavelength by multiplying by the refractive index.
 
He went over it all, thank you for the help as well! I get it now
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top