What is the vacuum wavelength of the incident light in nm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NeedsHelp1212
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the vacuum wavelength of light incident on a soap film with a refractive index of 1.33, where the second smallest film thickness for destructive interference is 296 nm. The equation used for destructive interference is 2t + 1/2 lambda = m lambda, leading to a calculated wavelength in the medium of 395 nm. To find the vacuum wavelength, the medium wavelength must be multiplied by the refractive index, resulting in a final calculation of approximately 526 nm. The confusion primarily stemmed from distinguishing between the wavelength in the medium and the vacuum wavelength. The participants clarified the relationship between the two wavelengths and confirmed the correct approach to the problem.
NeedsHelp1212
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When monochromatic light shines perpendicularly on a soap film (n = 1.33) with air on each side, the second smallest nonzero film thickness for which destructive interference of reflected light is observed is 296 nm. What is the vacuum wavelength of the light in nm?



Homework Equations



My teacher gave me this equation for destructive interference, it seems to differ from others but I am going to go with it: 2t + 1/2 lambda = (m) (lambda)



The Attempt at a Solution



2 (296) + 1/2 lambda = 2 lambda
592 + 1/2 lambda = 2 lambda
592= 1.5 lambda
lambda= 395 nm

The question asks what is the wavelength in the vacuum. I am confused? Did i just solve for the wavelength in the vacuum or for the wavelength in the medium? Because if its for the medium i know i would do n = lambda vac/ lambda med. So lambda vac = lambda med times n = 395 * 1.333

Im not sure what to do... please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's the logic: For destructive interference, there are n+1/2 wavelengths along the path in the medium, where n is an integer. The path is twice the thickness, so the equation is:
2t = (n+1/2) lambda.

Your prof's equation is the same except that his m is one bigger than my n.

The thinnest film has n=0. The one you want has n=1.

That lambda is the one in the medium, so indeed, you have to convert to the free space wavelength by multiplying by the refractive index.
 
He went over it all, thank you for the help as well! I get it now
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top