What is the value of n for the level in which the electron originated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter plstevens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Value
AI Thread Summary
An electron in a hydrogen atom transitions to the n=4 level, emitting light at 114 THz, which corresponds to an energy of 0.472 eV. The calculations show that the initial level must be n=6, derived from the energy difference equations. The conversion from THz to Hz is clarified as 1 THz equals 10^12 Hz, and the conversion from joules to electron volts uses the factor of 1 eV equaling 1.6 x 10^-19 J. The discussion also addresses how to calculate the energy difference (delta E) between levels. Overall, the calculations confirm that the original level of the electron is indeed n=6.
plstevens
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
An electron in a hydrogen atom relaxes to the n= 4 level, emitting light of 114THz.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
should be n=6
E=hf = (6.63*10^-34)(114*10^12) = 7.56*10^-20J = 0.472eV
E4= -13.6/4^2
En = -13.6/n^2
delta E =En-E4=0.85-13.6/n^2
deltaE = 0.472
you will find n=6
 
Thank you so much, but i have one question:

when u did 114*10^12 was that showing the conversion factor from THz to Hz?
 
also in the first step, how did u convert from J to eV? And where did delta E come from?
 
1THz = 10^12 Hz
1eV =1.6*10^-19 J
(7,.56 *10^-20)/(1.6*10^-19) = ? eV
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top