What Is the Value of Point Charge q in a Square Configuration?

AI Thread Summary
In a square configuration PQRS with point charges -Q, +Q, and -3Q fixed at points P, Q, and S, respectively, a point charge q at R experiences a net electric force towards S. The calculations indicate that the forces acting on q can be simplified, leading to the conclusion that q can be determined as 1/9 Q. The vertical components of the forces from points P and Q cancel each other, while the horizontal components add up towards S. There is some uncertainty expressed regarding the question's clarity and potential mistakes. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the importance of using trigonometry to resolve the forces acting on charge q.
Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


PQRS is a square. Three point charges -Q, +Q and -3Q are fixed at P, Q and S respectively as shown.

A point charge q is then placed at R and it experiences a net electric force towards S. Which of the following is equal to q?

photo :
http://s613.photobucket.com/user/Yan_Wa_Chung/media/01_zps421rebzc.png.html

Homework Equations


F=kq1q2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


in any kind of calculation, Q and q are canceled out and undetermined ,ie : (k1) (q) (Q) / (r1)^2 = (k2) (q) (Q) / (r2)^2, (turn force PR to vertical and horizontal component cancel the vertical component with force QR) . I have no idea on the question or maybe the question itself has mistakes ?The right answer is q=1/9 Q.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think any value of q (+ve) will do since the distances are fixed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
cnh1995 said:
Vertical component of force PR cancels force QR. Horizontal component of force PR and force SR add up along SR and hence, the resultantant is directed towards S. All you need to do is use trigonometry to calculate the respective components, with only one unknown q. How is q undetermined?
But suppose vertical component of force PR is ##-cos(\pi/4)kQq/r_1^2## so since it is canceled by force QR we 'll have
##-cos(\pi/4)kQq/r_1^2+kQq/r_2^2=0##. Isnt the product Qq simplified by this last equation?
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Delta² said:
But suppose vertical component of force PR is ##-cos(\pi/4)kQq/r_1^2## so since it is canceled by force QR we 'll have
##-cos(\pi/4)kQq/r_1^2+kQq/r_2^2=0##. Isnt the product Qq simplified by this last equation?
Yes. I was about to edit..
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Thanks a lot for answering this question. I think the question may have mistakes itself. I hope I can get some help with the last stupid question that I've posted too. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top