What is the Velocity of a Disc Thrown at a 28° Angle to the Ground?

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc Flight Path
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity and time of flight for a disc thrown at a 28° angle, landing 39.8 meters away. The initial calculations suggest that the resultant velocity (vR) is 22 m/s, and the time in the air is approximately 2.1 seconds. Participants emphasize the importance of treating the disc as a simple projectile rather than a Frisbee, which would require additional information. There is a recommendation to work symbolically until the final step to maintain accuracy and clarity in calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights the application of projectile motion equations and the significance of understanding the underlying physics principles.
STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



A disc is thrown at a 28° angle to the ground. It landed 39.8m away.

a) What is the velocity of the disc?
b) How long was the disc in the air?

Homework Equations



##θ = 28°##
##\vec{Δd}_H = 39.8 m [F]##

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I was thinking I should use the equation ##\vec{Δd}_H = \vec{v}_H Δt##. I of course don't have a time or horizontal velocity to work with, but what I do have is that :

##\vec{v}_H = \vec{v}_R cos(θ)## and subbing back I get ##\vec{Δd}_H = \vec{v}_R cos(θ) Δt## ( Note vR is the resultant velocity ).

Now as for ##Δt##, I want to replace it with ##\frac{2 \vec{v}_R sin(θ)}{\vec{a}}## as I can work with it.

So plugging back into my equation a second time and moving things around a bit I get :

##\vec{v}_{R}^{2} = \frac{ (39.8)(9.8) }{ (1.76)(sin(28°)) }##
##∴ \vec{v}_{R} = 22 m/s##

b) I simply use ##Δt = \frac{2 \vec{v}_R sin(θ)}{\vec{a}}## and I get ##Δt = 2.1 s##.

Part a) is the one I'm concerned with. Hopefully it looks okay.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Zondrina said:

Homework Statement



A disc is thrown at a 28° angle to the ground. It landed 39.8m away.

a) What is the velocity of the disc?
b) How long was the disc in the air?

Homework Equations



##θ = 28°##
##\vec{Δd}_H = 39.8 m [F]##

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I was thinking I should use the equation ##\vec{Δd}_H = \vec{v}_H Δt##. I of course don't have a time or horizontal velocity to work with, but what I do have is that :

##\vec{v}_H = \vec{v}_R cos(θ)## and subbing back I get ##\vec{Δd}_H = \vec{v}_R cos(θ) Δt## ( Note vR is the resultant velocity ).

Now as for ##Δt##, I want to replace it with ##\frac{2 \vec{v}_R sin(θ)}{\vec{a}}## as I can work with it.

So plugging back into my equation a second time and moving things around a bit I get :

##\vec{v}_{R}^{2} = \frac{ (39.8)(9.8) }{ (1.76)(sin(28°)) }##
##∴ \vec{v}_{R} = 22 m/s##

b) I simply use ##Δt = \frac{2 \vec{v}_R sin(θ)}{\vec{a}}## and I get ##Δt = 2.1 s##.

Part a) is the one I'm concerned with. Hopefully it looks okay.

Without reading your solution, there is a simple question.

Are you to consider this disc as a simple projectile, or is the flight more like a Frisby? If it is like a Frisby, you need much more information.

Are you actually talking about a discus?
 
PeterO said:
Without reading your solution, there is a simple question.

Are you to consider this disc as a simple projectile, or is the flight more like a Frisby? If it is like a Frisby, you need much more information.

Are you actually talking about a discus?

Yeah I guess disc can be interpreted as a discus. I don't think the question is intending it to be a frisby.
 
Zondrina said:
Yeah I guess disc can be interpreted as a discus. I don't think the question is intending it to be a frisby.

If this amounts to a simple projectile, analysis of the vertical and horizontal components leads to a simple range formula, which you may find in your text or on the web.

That formula ultimately involves using the sine of 56o rather than 28o, so I am not sure of your calculations.

where did your 1.76 value come from?
 
PeterO said:
If this amounts to a simple projectile, analysis of the vertical and horizontal components leads to a simple range formula, which you may find in your text or on the web.

That formula ultimately involves using the sine of 56o rather than 28o, so I am not sure of your calculations.

where did your 1.76 value come from?

##cos(28°) = 0.88## and then (0.88)(2) = 1.76.
 
Zondrina said:
##cos(28°) = 0.88## and then (0.88)(2) = 1.76.

OK, in that case your figures should be correct.

If you had left your denominator uncalculated it would have read 2.cos28°.sin28°, which, using the double angle formula (sin(2A) = 2.sinA.CosA) equals the sin56° I was expecting to see.

The range formula simplifies to Range = [V2.sin(2θ)]/g or (V2/g).sin(2θ)

which shows maximum range is when sin(2θ) = 1 or θ = 45°.
 
Zondrina said:
##∴ \vec{v}_{R} = 22 m/s##
Seems a little inaccurate. To preserve accuracy, it's best to work entirely symbolically until the final step. What expression do you get for vR in terms of g, θ and dH if you do that?
 
PeterO said:
OK, in that case your figures should be correct.

If you had left your denominator uncalculated it would have read 2.cos28°.sin28°, which, using the double angle formula (sin(2A) = 2.sinA.CosA) equals the sin56° I was expecting to see.

The range formula simplifies to Range = [V2.sin(2θ)]/g or (V2/g).sin(2θ)

which shows maximum range is when sin(2θ) = 1 or θ = 45°.

Yeah I definitely should use that identity more often. It makes it easier to look at for sure. Thanks for your help :).
 
haruspex said:
Seems a little inaccurate. To preserve accuracy, it's best to work entirely symbolically until the final step. What expression do you get for vR in terms of g, θ and dH if you do that?

True: your adoption of the 0.88 value loses the fact it is really 0.882964 so a small variation comes in.
 
  • #10
I don't really mind the inaccuracies of the computations too much, it's the understanding I care for.
 
  • #11
Zondrina said:
I don't really mind the inaccuracies of the computations too much, it's the understanding I care for.
OK, but I would still urge working symbolically until the last. It makes it much easier for others to follow the logic and easier for everyone to spot mistakes. A trick I often use after completing the algebra is to pick a set of easy values, substitute them at various points in it, and see if the answer it gives suddenly changes.
 
Back
Top