What is the weight needed to push water through a pipe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Baxidur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Lift Water
AI Thread Summary
To push water through a pipe, the pressure at the bottom of the pipe must exceed the equivalent of the height of the water column, which is 20cm in this case. Initially, the water in the first vessel provides 10cm of pressure, requiring an additional 10cm of pressure from the weight placed on the piston, equating to the weight of the water itself. As the water level decreases, the required weight increases, eventually needing to supply the full 20cm of pressure when the first vessel is nearly empty. This results in a total weight requirement of twice the weight of the water in the cylinder. Understanding these dynamics involves considering both static pressure and the potential momentum of the water flow.
Baxidur
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi

Finding it hard to find exact information on the maths and forces behind this on the internet, (maybe my search terms to blade)

If I have a 10cm diamter cylinder that's 10cm deep and filled with water and a piston (weightless piston for the example) at the top and a 1 cm diameter pipe running from the base, how much weight would I have to place on the piston to push all of the water 20cm high into another recepticle?

Thanks in advance for anyone that can answer this, Also the formulas required to calculate it would be great

Baxidur
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you know some classical mechanics, first calculate the mass of the water from its density and volume, then figure out how much force is needed to "beat" gravity in this case.
 
very basic mechanics so here goes

(rounded for ease)

785 cubic centimetres
0.785 kilograms of mass

Finding hard to find gravitys specific force online

Also doesn't pascals law and the surface area of piston come in somewhere?
 
There seems to be important information missing. What shape is the second receptacle and how exactly is it positioned in relation to the first? E.g. is it the same shape, with its base 20cm higher? Or a very much wider vessel?
The reason you need to know is that a weight sufficient to start the transfer might not be enough to complete it. This gets very complicated if we have to take into account the momentum in the water.
So I'll answer a simpler question for now...
Suppose the second vessel is like the first, 20cm higher, and take the pipe to be very narrow (so no momentum to worry about).
To get the flow started, you just need the pressure at the bottom of the first cylinder to exceed that needed to support a 20cm column. You have 10cm of pressure coming from the water in the first vessel, so you only need an extra 10cm worth from the weight. I.e. the weight would need to equal the weight of the water.
But as the flow continues, you're getting less help from the weight of water in the first vessel and more push back from that in the second. At the end, you're having to push water up 30cm with no help at all, so you now need 3 times the weight.
Thinking about it some more, I suspect that the second vessel is irrelevant: the pipe rises 20cm and all you are intended to do is push all of the water into the pipe (with it overflowing from the top).
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply

Yeah, sorry I didn't make that clear, I've attached a diagram


Thanks again
 

Attachments

  • water.jpg
    water.jpg
    19.6 KB · Views: 699
Last edited:
OK, so the details of the second vessel are irrelevant. It will never exert any pushback on the water. All that matters is pushing the water to the top of the pipe.
As I said, the key thing to consider is the pressure at the bottom of the pipe. For the water to be reaching the top of the pipe this must be at least the equivalent of 20cm of water (the height of the pipe). At first, the water in the first vessel supplies 10cm of pressure, so you need another 10cm pressure from the weight. This means the weight will be the same as the weight of the water, π/4 kg.
But as the water level in the first vessel goes down, the extra weight needed will increase. Strictly speaking, we'd have to take into account the momentum of the water flowing in the pipe, which all gets pretty complicated; but if we assume it flows arbitrarily slowly then we can just consider the static position when the first vessel is almost empty. At this point the weight on top is getting no help from the weight of water and has to supply the entire 20cm of pressure. Hence the weight needed will be twice as much, π/2 kg.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top