What is the Wells cycle and how long does it last?

  • Context: Stargazing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Helios
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cycle Eclipse
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of the Wells cycle, proposed by Garrick Wells, which is described as an eclipse cycle lasting 51,649 days. Participants explore its implications, potential connections to other eclipse cycles, and mathematical relationships with calendar systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the Wells cycle as a 51,649-day eclipse cycle, suggesting that an eclipse observed from a specific location will likely recur after this duration.
  • Another participant compares the Wells cycle to the Saros cycle, implying a potential relationship between the two.
  • A different participant references Poincaré's recurrence theorem, indicating a possible theoretical underpinning for the cycle's recurrence.
  • One participant discusses a mathematical breakdown of the number of days in relation to thirteen-month calendars, noting that the total number of days aligns with specific mathematical properties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of interest and propose different connections to established cycles and mathematical concepts, but no consensus is reached regarding the validity or implications of the Wells cycle.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to external sources and mathematical relationships that may not be fully explained or resolved within the thread, leaving some assumptions and definitions open to interpretation.

Helios
Messages
267
Reaction score
63
I discovered an eclipse cycle. It will be called the Wells cycle ( Garrick Wells ). It is simply a cycle of 51649 days. I believe that if you see an eclipse, then 51649 days later, another will likely be seen from your same location. I've have indeed found an example of this while probing the NASA Phases-of-the-Moon web site. The series lasted seventeen centuries, with just one fail. Should someone offer some explanation, I'd love to hear it.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I found a discussion of thirteen-month calandars in which the figure in the OP falls naturally out of the conversation:

The total number of days is 2,014,311 = 3 * (13^2) * 29 * 137.
So not only is the number (39) of 1749-month cycles is divisible by 13,
but the number of days (51649) in each 1749-month cycle.
Each 1749-month cycle
= 107 yerms
= 1749 months
= 3979 trecena
= 32 drifts over 29-day cycle
= 51649 days
= 2 yerm eras

http://www.nabble.com/Re:-5515-Year-Luni-Solar-Cycle-p20917812.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
14K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
69K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K