What Is the x Component of the Electric Field at a Point on the x-Axis?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the x component of the electric field at a point on the x-axis due to a charged rod with a non-uniform linear charge density. Participants clarify that the charge density λ varies along the rod and that the electric field must be determined by integrating contributions from infinitesimal charge elements. The correct approach involves using Coulomb's law to find the electric field from a small section of the rod and integrating from -L/2 to L/2. There is confusion about the distance r, which participants confirm should be calculated based on the rod's length and the distance from the point of interest. Ultimately, the integration method is emphasized as necessary for solving the problem accurately.
Broem
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charged rod of length L = 1.00 m lies centered on the x-axis as shown. The rod has a linear charge density which varies according to λ = ax where a = −90.0 μC/m.
What is the x component of the electric field at a point on the x-axis a distance of D = 2.00 m from the end of the rod?

Homework Equations


E=kQ/r^2
charge density = Q/A

The Attempt at a Solution


I really do not understand...Where do I get the r from? Since its not uniformly distributed how can there be any field outside?
Would my r = (D-(half of L))?
I'm assuming lambda is just regular charge density at a location of x?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Broem! :smile:
Broem said:
Would my r = (D-(half of L))?
I'm assuming lambda is just regular charge density at a location of x?

Yes. :smile:

(and of course it's a linear charge density, ie coulombs per metre, not per metre3 :wink:)
Since its not uniformly distributed how can there be any field outside?

Not following you. :confused:
 
Thanks for the quick response!
Ok so here's where I am:

I now know that lambda = Q/L so Q = L * (lambda)

So I'm left with
9e9(-9e-6)/(2-.5)^2

This however is not the correct answer...Where can I go from here?
 
oh, no, you'll have to integrate

use coulomb's law to find the electric field from a tiny section [x,x+dx] (whose charge will be λdx, and which you can assume is concentrated entirely at x), and integrate from -L/2 to L/2 :wink:
 
I got it!
Thank you so much for your help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top