What is the Young's Modulus of Copper?

  • Thread starter Thread starter groom03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Copper Modulus
groom03
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm supposed to calculate the youngs modulus of a 2 meter length of copper wire.


Homework Equations


None


The Attempt at a Solution


for 30SWG i get 26GPa
for 38 i get 3.1 GPa
and for 24 i get 49 GPa

Youngs modulus of copper is meant to be ~100GPa (from wiki)

Have i forgotten to do something or are my results way off?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You aren't 'calculating young's modulus'. You looked that up. You are calculating something else. What is it? What formula are you using to obtain it? The units of what you are after probably aren't GPa.
 
I made a force extension graph and the gradient is k i use that in the formula E=kL/A
where L is the original length and A is the cross sectional area of the wire.
 
Ok, so k=EA/L. The units of E are N/m^2, A is m^2 and L is m. So the units of k are N/m. If that's the units for your answers they don't look right. Pick 24SWG for example. What's the wire diameter? What do you get for the area?
 
Sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry to waste peoples time, me and my teacher had a look at it today and ,my answer is right but there is a huge error because of the rubbishy equipment i was stuck using
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top