What Magnetic Field Strength Can a Circular Copper Loop Produce?

lemaire
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You have 16 m of 0.7 mm diameter copper wire and a battery capable of passing 21 A through the wire.
What magnetic field strength could you obtain at the center of a single circular loop made from the wire?

Homework Equations



Ampere's law

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe that the radius inside the loop will be 0.7mm and the radius of the loop will be the circumference of the wire divided by 2pie. At the right side of Ampere's law, which radius will be used?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0.7 mm is the diameter of the copper wire, not the radius of the loop.
 
My question is this: we have at the left of Ampere's law B2piR. Is this R(radius) the circumference divided by 2pie?. If we set up a surface like a Gaussian surface, we have an inside radius which is half the original diameter of the wire(0.7/2).
 
The circumference of the loop is the length of the wire used to make the loop, and you can calculate the radius of the loop from that. The radius of the wire plays no role in this problem.

Also, you would need the Biot-Savart law to calculate the current at the center of a loop. For a straight wire you have cylindrical symmetry, where the magnetic field is constant for circles about the wire, but for a wire loop that's no longer true, so you need the Biot-Savart law.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top