What materials should I get for studying physics?

AI Thread Summary
For studying physics seriously, the Feynman Lectures on Physics are highly recommended for their clear presentation of complex topics. While they can be expensive, they are valuable for committed learners. Additionally, exploring library resources can provide a variety of books that align with personal interests. A solid understanding of calculus, particularly differential equations and vector calculus, is essential for grasping advanced concepts in physics. Overall, a mix of foundational texts and supplementary materials will enhance the learning experience.
timothycjvs
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi I'm beginning to take physics a little more serious than ever and starting with maths. just want to know if there is any advice on what materials to get for my long studies?
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm going to be a 3rd year physics major this coming fall. I've found the Feynman Lectures on Physics to be nothing short of amazing. They present anything you could ever want to know or learn in a physics classroom in a very easy-to-understand format. They're expensive, if I remember right, so it's not something you should buy if physics is a passing fancy.

Other than that, go to the library and find and read whatever books interest you. Read up on calculus too, specifical differential equations and vector calculus. Knowing at least the basics of these will help massively when your teacher starts throwing up equations and proofs with little explanation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top