Programs What math courses should I take (math/physics double major)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the importance of specific mathematical courses for a student pursuing a theoretical physics path alongside a math major. Key topics include the relevance of group theory and differential geometry, with a recommendation to take both due to their utility in theoretical physics. Advanced real analysis is also considered beneficial, as it provides a rigorous foundation for understanding calculus and functions, which are essential in physics. The discussion highlights the value of a year-long sequence in measure theory and probability, noting that many graduate physicists lack a strong background in probability, making it a worthwhile course to consider. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in future academic and career plans, particularly regarding the level of theoretical engagement desired in physics and the importance of rigorous mathematical foundations versus practical applications.
feuxfollets
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
So I know there's another thread but I don't want to hijack it, and I'm going to math major as well so I'll be taking another 8-10 or so semesters beyond calculus/linear algebra. I'm interested in doing physics with a theoretical bent.

From what I've gathered, group theory and differential geometry would be useful. My school has a one-year sequence on Abstract Algebra (groups, rings, fields, etc.) and Differential geometry/topology. Should I take both of those? There's also a year on lie algebras but that's burried deep within other grad level stuff.

Is Advanced real analysis useful for a physicist?
Course description is: (2 semesters)

Construction of real numbers, the topology of the real line and the foundations of single variable calculus. Notions of
convergence for sequences of functions. Basic approximation theorems for continuous functions and rigorous treatment of
elementary transcendental functions. The course is intended to teach students how to read and construct rigorous formal proofs

The Arzela-Ascoli theorem. Introduction to the topology of metric spaces with an emphasis on
higher dimensional Euclidean spaces. The contraction mapping principle. Inverse and implicit function theorems. Rigorous
treatment of higher dimensional differential calculus. Introduction to Fourier analysis and asymptotic methods

There's also a one-year sequence on Measure theory/probability theory/stochastic processes. I've heard probability is something a lot of grad physicists lack so should I take that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
feuxfollets said:
So I know there's another thread but I don't want to hijack it, and I'm going to math major as well so I'll be taking another 8-10 or so semesters beyond calculus/linear algebra. I'm interested in doing physics with a theoretical bent.

You need to specify your future plans more.

1) How theoretical will your physics be? Will it be mathematical physics like string theory?
2) What kinds of physics will you be interested in?
3) Do you want to do math for its own sake, or do you merely want the math to be useful for physics?
4) Do you want your physics to be well-founded in math? Or do you accept sloppy math to be used in physics? That is: do you want things to be defined and proved rigorously, or is that less important to you than actually getting physical results?

The answers useful to you will depend a lot on these questions.
 
  • Like
Likes IGU
Over 4 years have passed since feuxfollets posted seeking advice on maths appropriate to physics study.

We hope he chose well and went on to graduate.

Thread closed.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top