What Phase Difference Causes Maximum SHM Separation Equal to Amplitude?

AI Thread Summary
Two particles in simple harmonic motion (SHM) with the same amplitude and frequency but a phase difference can achieve a maximum separation equal to the amplitude. The discussion centers on determining the phase difference that results in this maximum separation. The initial calculations suggested a phase difference of pi/2, but further analysis indicated that the correct phase difference is pi/3. The reasoning involved examining the conditions under which the maximum separation occurs, confirming that the maximum separation can exceed the amplitude under certain circumstances. Ultimately, the conclusion reached is that the correct phase difference for achieving maximum separation equal to the amplitude is indeed pi/3.
manjuvenamma
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
Two particles are executing SHM with same amplitude and frequency (but with a phase difference). The maximum separation between them was found to be equal to the amplitude. What is the phase difference. This is a question that I came across.

And I solved it the following way.

Assume one is y1 = A sin (wt) and the other one y2 = A sin (wt + phi)
max(y1-y2) = A (given)
Solve for phi.

Since both y1 and y2 are sinusoids of w frequency, their difference will also be a sinusoid with a different amplitude but with same frequency and a different phase.

Since we are just interested in the max value of the difference, I calculated the amplitude of the sinusoid using phasors A e^j(phi) - A. It turned out to be 2A sin(phi/2). From that I calculated phi as pi/3 but the answer I have is as pi/2. I think the book is correct but I could not find the mistake in my calculation.

Can some one point out if I am wrong and if yes, where?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The correct answer is pi/3. The answer in the book is wrong.
 
I think I am wrong because the difference between A sin(wt) and A sin (wt+pi/2) is A at t=0 itself. I think the difference between A sin(wt) and A sin (wt+pi/3) is never A ( which is what is required). I am not able to find a mistake in my method though. Can you tell at what 't' the the difference between A sin(wt) and A sin (wt+pi/3) is A? Thanks for your time and effort.
 
Hi manjuvenamma,

You can't find a specific time in seconds until you specify \omega, but here is one time that works:

t = \frac{1}{\omega} (2.61799\ \mbox{radians})

(So if you just use \omega t=2.61799 radians as a whole into your functions you will get the right answer.)

You can find this by solving (after cancelling out the A's) for t:

<br /> \sin(\omega t +\pi/3) -\sin(\omega t) = \pm 1<br />
 
manjuvenamma said:
I think I am wrong because the difference between A sin(wt) and A sin (wt+pi/2) is A at t=0 itself. I think the difference between A sin(wt) and A sin (wt+pi/3) is never A ( which is what is required). I am not able to find a mistake in my method though. Can you tell at what 't' the the difference between A sin(wt) and A sin (wt+pi/3) is A? Thanks for your time and effort.

Yes, at first glance it may seem so. When particle 1 is at x=0, and particle 2 is at x=A, then their separation is A. But the problem states that the maximum separation is A, which is not true here..

Let us analyze this situation stated above.

Case 1:

2 is at x=A, and 1 is going away from x=0 in the -ve direction. Since the speed of 2 at the extreme point is very small compared to 1, without any calculation we can say that their separation will be more than A for some time after this.

Case 2:

2 is at x=A, and 1 is going toward 2 from x=0, that is, in the +ve direction. We know that when 1 will reach the extreme position, 2 would have come to the mean position x=0. After that, the same argument as in case 1 applies.

As we see, in both of these cases, the maximum separation is more than A.

What you have written in the first post is correct, and the answer is pi/3.
 
Thanks so much, Shooting Star and alphysicist!
I am now convinced that I am right and I know the correct method too!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top