What physical situation creates such a B field?

member 545369

Homework Statement


We are given that the B-field is:
$${\bf{B}} = C \delta(s-R) \hat{\phi}$$

where ##s## is the distance from some object and ##R## is the radius of some object. What kind of physical situation would create such a B-field?

Homework Equations


Stated above.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
This is a tough question because it really involves creativity more than anything else. A "toroidal coil" creates a B-field that points in ##\hat{\phi}## and is constant but even if you figure out a clever way of canceling out the B-field in all but one location, how can you make it "infinite" at ##s = R##?

Electric monopoles are usually characterized by the ##\delta## function, but magnetic monopoles don't exist so I can't really extend that analogy any further!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
talrefae said:
Electric monopoles are usually characterized by the δδ\delta function, but magnetic monopoles don't exist so I can't really extend that analogy any further!
But magnetic dipoles do exist. Think about what happens as you make a dipole smaller and smaller. What function would describe an infinitely small dipole?

EDIT: Looking at the equation itself a bit more carefully, ##\mathbf{B}## is nonzero along a ring of radius ##R## (assuming cylindrical coordinates) and zero everywhere else. I don't know what physical situation would produce this but you can picture it as a single circular magnetic field line at ##R##.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top