Programs What should I study/specialize in if I want to work with fusion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HectorViruega
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion Work
AI Thread Summary
Aiming to work in fusion reactors, the discussion highlights the importance of selecting the right educational path. While pure physics is a common route, engineering, particularly in fields like aerospace and fluid mechanics, is also viable. Many professionals in fusion research come from diverse backgrounds, including plasma physics, electromagnetics, and applied mathematics. The conversation emphasizes that engineers play significant roles in research, not just in design and construction. It suggests that students should focus on areas of personal interest within physics or engineering that align with fusion research, as multiple paths can lead to success in this field.
HectorViruega
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Hello everyone. I've always wanted to be a scientist, and in recent years I've figured out that I want to be a physicist. What are of physics has been a little harder to figure out, since there are a lot of areas that interest me, however, recently I have been getting more and more excited about fusion reactors. I am very drawn to the idea of nearly limitless clean energy for everyone, and even though there is a possibility that we'll never make fusion reactor work efficiently enough for them to be economically viable, I still would love to work in that field.

My question is, what should I study if I want to work in that field? I've heard that a lot of engineers get jobs as scientists working with machines like the Large Hadron Collider. Is this true? Would I then be better off majoring in engineering over pure physics? What about Engineering Physics (which one of the schools I'd like to get into gives as a major)? Would it be a good starting point? Also, in what area of physics should I do my master's and Ph.D.?

I know it's a lot of questions but I'd really appreciate the help.

TL;DR: I want to work with fusion reactors. What should I major/specialize in?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LHC has nothing to do with fusion, better specialize in plasma physics and electromagnteics.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Dr Transport said:
LHC has nothing to do with fusion, better specialize in plasma physics and electromagnteics.
I mentioned the LHC as an example of engineers getting jobs as scientists, not because it has anything to do; I should have clarified more. I've heard that a lot of people working on the LHC are engineers, is that true? If so, would fusion reactors be similar in that they hire a lof of engineers? If that is the case, should I major in pure physics, or some type of engineering?

Sorry for the confusion.
 
HectorViruega said:
I've heard that a lot of people working on the LHC are engineers, is that true?
Yes, but they are working mainly with the engineering aspects.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
I have a PhD in an engineering field (aerospace engineering, specifically) and worked for a while doing fusion research. It was not a "nuts-and-bolts" kind of job where I designed/built a machine and let the "real" scientists do research with it, but an actual research position. Engineers fill both roles. As someone with a background in fluid mechanics, I was running fluids experiments to help understand the fluid physics involved in the problem.

There were a very wide array of scientists working the research side of this and adjacent problems, with varied backgrounds such as: plasma physics, electromagnetics, engineering (primarily fluid mechanics, electrical, materials), astrophysics, chemistry, applied mathematics, and I am sure plenty whom I've forgotten.

Generally, there are multiple paths to the same end goal. Study the aspect(s) of the problem that interest(s) you and tailor your specialization within that field toward fusion.
 
  • Like
Likes HectorViruega
boneh3ad said:
I have a PhD in an engineering field (aerospace engineering, specifically) and worked for a while doing fusion research. It was not a "nuts-and-bolts" kind of job where I designed/built a machine and let the "real" scientists do research with it, but an actual research position. Engineers fill both roles. As someone with a background in fluid mechanics, I was running fluids experiments to help understand the fluid physics involved in the problem.

There were a very wide array of scientists working the research side of this and adjacent problems, with varied backgrounds such as: plasma physics, electromagnetics, engineering (primarily fluid mechanics, electrical, materials), astrophysics, chemistry, applied mathematics, and I am sure plenty whom I've forgotten.

Generally, there are multiple paths to the same end goal. Study the aspect(s) of the problem that interest(s) you and tailor your specialization within that field toward fusion.
Thanks

Thanks! That was very helpful. I'm still figuring out what I am most interested in, but it's good to know I can still get into experimental physics even if I don't study pure physics.
 
  • Like
Likes boneh3ad
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top