What Static Load Should a Linear Actuator Handle for a 5kg Object?

AI Thread Summary
To select a linear actuator for a 5kg object, it is essential to understand the distinction between weight and mass, as electric scales measure weight under gravity. A 5kg object corresponds to approximately 50 Newtons, and electric scales do account for gravity when displaying weight in kilograms. Manufacturers' static load ratings, such as 100N or 500 lbs, indicate the maximum weight the actuator can hold, factoring in gravitational force. The terms "lbs" and "pound" are interchangeable, both referring to the same unit of weight. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining the appropriate actuator specifications.
bbq_build
Messages
62
Reaction score
2
Hello, I measured an object using an electric scale. It is 5kg. I want to select a linear actuator such that when placed vertically, it can keep the object on hold at a fixed height. In this case, what static load (in lbs and Netwon) should the actuator be capable of handling? I am confused by different units listed by different manufacturers. Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Use Google. If you enter: convert 5kg it will show hints for what to convert it to (pounds, grams, Newtons, stones)
 
I know how to do conversion using google. The confusion I have is whether the manufacturers and the electric scale take gravity into consideration when showing the numbers. For example:

When I measured the weight of the object using a scale, it reads 5kg. So, in Newton, it is 5kg*9.81m/s2 ~= 50N. However, objects are under gravity. So, the electric scale measured the object under gravity. Shouldn't that 5kg has already included an increased scale factor of 9.81? Does the electric scale takes gravity into consideration when showing weight in kg?

When manufacturers state the static load, I am not sure if they have taken gravity into consideration. For example, if the stated static load of a motor is 100N, does that mean it can hold an object of about 10kg? Similarly, if a company states that their motor has a static load of 500 lbs, does that mean it can hold an object of about 227kg. (If the object is put on an electric scale, it gives 227kg?) 227kg is the value given by a calculator I found using google. Seem to be too large.
 
Last edited:
bbq_build said:
Does the electric scale takes gravity into consideration when showing weight in kg?
Yes. Electric (or electronic) scales are glorified spring scales, you are measuring Grams of Force (due to gravity). If you take that scale and 5kg weight to the Moon, the scale will read about 0.83kg. That's because gravity on the Moon is about 1/6 of Earths gravity. If you want to measure Mass, you use a Balance and put the unknown mass in one pan and put various known masses in the other until the scale "balances." Then you will get the same readings whether you are on Earth, the Moon or Jupiter.

Addendum: The classical way of measuring mass is to find the force required (in Newtons) to accelerate the mass at 1 meter per second, per second. The answer is the mass in kilograms. That works anywhere, on any planet or even in space. (because that is the definition of a Newton)

So just keep things sorted out in your mind: Weight is grams, pounds, stones, etc, of force on an object due to gravity; Mass is measured by how much force it takes to accelerate that object to 1m/S2.

Enjoy!
Tom
 
  • Like
Likes bbq_build
Thanks Tom. Sometimes manufactures use lbs as the unit of the static load. For most google unit conversions , they use pounds. Are they the same thing? In other words, is 1 lbs = 1 pound? lbs does not sound like an abbreviation of pound.
 
bbq_build said:
Are they the same thing? In other words, is 1 lbs = 1 pound?
Yes, the same, isn't English weird?
According to wikipedia, lb is from the ancient Roman libra, from the Hellenic system, which was built on the Egyptians, who were influenced by the Mesopotamians!

Here is the link to wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(mass)
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top