What to do when language in a text gets rough

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice109
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Language Text
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges faced when reading a rigorous pure mathematics textbook, particularly regarding the clarity of language and the understanding of theorems and proofs. Participants share their experiences and suggest strategies for improving comprehension.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration with the complexity of language in a specific pure math textbook, noting difficulty in distinguishing between assumptions and conditions.
  • Another suggests various strategies for tackling difficult texts, including comparing different books, re-reading, attempting proofs independently, and seeking help from professors.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of intuition over strict proof-seeking in mathematics, suggesting that understanding examples may enhance comprehension.
  • One reply points out that the chosen textbook is older and recommends a different book, claiming it uses more accessible language.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present a range of strategies and perspectives on how to approach difficult mathematical texts, indicating that there is no consensus on a single effective method. Some participants advocate for intuitive understanding, while others emphasize rigorous proof techniques.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the subjective nature of clarity in mathematical texts and the varying levels of prior knowledge among participants, which may affect their interpretations and strategies.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers struggling with rigorous mathematics texts, educators seeking to support students, and individuals interested in improving their mathematical comprehension skills.

ice109
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
6
specifically a pure math book? I'm reading this textbook and sometimes it takes me so long to figure out what the theorem or something is actually saying. I can't tell whether parts of it are supposed or are conditions or if they're using some characteristic of another proven part of the concept.

:cry:

it's so annoying cause for about 12 pages i really liked this book due to its rigor now its rigor is killing me.

its this one

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521664020/?tag=pfamazon01-20

if anyone knows a book like this, that's develops all the concepts from scratch, but is clearer I would very much like to know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can do a varity of things:

1) Pick up a new book on the subject and compare wording.
2) Re-read.
3) Attempt to complete the proof before the text gives it to you (this is a skill that you should start working on anyway, because many of the graduate math texts I have used tend to assume you can prove the almost every theorem they give you without too much insight).
4) Ask a professor to assist you are stumped.
 
in particular since it is a math book u should tend to be more intutive than looking for proofs in the book once u satisfy urdelf with an example then probably u will fell lot better.
 
You've chosen an old book to look into. Try Arfken and Weber. The words are more common.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K