What was Maggie's acceleration in a 100m race with a dead heat finish?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Freeze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Race
AI Thread Summary
In a 100m race, both Maggie and Judy finish in a dead heat at 10.2 seconds, with Maggie accelerating for 2.10 seconds and Judy for 3.10 seconds. The discussion centers on calculating Maggie's acceleration, with initial attempts using kinematic equations leading to confusion. It is clarified that the race consists of two phases: acceleration and constant speed, requiring separate equations for each phase. Ultimately, through a series of calculations and adjustments, Maggie's acceleration is determined to be approximately 5.27 m/s².
Freeze
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Ok this is another problem I am having trouble with.

In a 100 m race, Maggie and Judy cross the finish line in a dead heat, both taking 10.2 s. Accelerating uniformly, Maggie took 2.10 s and Judy 3.10 s to attain maximum speed, which they maintained for the rest of the race. What was Maggie's acceleration?

Ok so I know that

Si (initial distance)= 0 m
Sf (final distance)= 100m
Delta T = 10.2s (10-0)

Vi( Initial velocity of maggy and Judy) = 0 m/s

I think Judy's time is there just to distract us, because every time I try to use both set of data and plug them into a kinematic equations for motion with constant acceleration, I reach a dead end.

So I tried a different method

100m - Sf = 1/2 * a * (2.10s) ^ 2

100m - Sf = 2.205A

A = (100m-Sf)/2.205

And Then I tried to plug that back into the SF equatoin but that didn't help.


Can anyone point me to the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a 100 m race, Maggie and Judy cross the finish line in a dead heat, both taking 10.2 s. Accelerating uniformly, Maggie took 2.10 s and Judy 3.10 s to attain maximum speed, which they maintained for the rest of the race. What was Maggie's acceleration?

Since the acceleration isn't constant throughout the race, you can't simply use 1/2a*t^2.

So maggie's position would be something like this:

1/2a*(2.1)^2 + vf(10.2-2.1) = 100m

You can find vf by saying vf = a*t where t is how much time she spent accelerating. I hope I didn't give away too much!
 
Freeze said:
Ok this is another problem I am having trouble with.

In a 100 m race, Maggie and Judy cross the finish line in a dead heat, both taking 10.2 s. Accelerating uniformly, Maggie took 2.10 s and Judy 3.10 s to attain maximum speed, which they maintained for the rest of the race. What was Maggie's acceleration?

So you have

1. Time taken by both to reach the finish line = 10.2 seconds (since this is a dead heat)
2. Distance covered by both in 10.2 seconds = 100m
3. Suppose Vm and Vj are the speeds of Maggie and Judy at any time t, then Vm is maximum at 2.10s and Vj is maximum for 3.10s.

Now draw a graph of Vm versus t and Vj versus t. Find the maximum speed of both Maggie and Judy (given the initial speed = 0 m/s). After t = Tmax--different for Maggie and Judy--the speeds are constant and equal to their respective values at 2.10s and 3.10s. Does that give you some idea how to draw the graph? (If not, the v-t graph has a linearly increasing section followed by a line parallel to the time axis).

Ok so I know that

Si (initial distance)= 0 m
Sf (final distance)= 100m
Delta T = 10.2s (10-0)

Vi( Initial velocity of maggy and Judy) = 0 m/s
Okay up to here.

I think Judy's time is there just to distract us, because every time I try to use both set of data and plug them into a kinematic equations for motion with constant acceleration, I reach a dead end.
Thats probably because your analysis isn't quite right. And you get equations which aren't too friendly either.

So I tried a different method

100m - Sf = 1/2 * a * (2.10s) ^ 2

100m - Sf = 2.205A

A = (100m-Sf)/2.205

I don't see what you are doing. Sf has a different meaning here does it? Otherwise, from what you wrote above, 100m = Sf and so each of these equations makes no sense.

And Then I tried to plug that back into the SF equatoin but that didn't help.

Can anyone point me to the right direction?

Well I think you should graphically do this first, because the solution isn't very difficult and can be done in more than one way. You need two equations for the two accelerations, given the above conditions. Try and rework this after making the graph and follow up with your solution.

Cheers
Vivek
 
I thought you were saying Sf = 100 m ?

Anyway, like you said, forget about judy.

Split the sprint into two sections : (1) the acceleration , (2) the cruise

What do you know about section (1) ? The time taken, t = 2.1 s. Call the distance s, the acceleration a, and the final velocity v. What equations can you write relating these quantities.

Now for section (2), the distance run is 100 - s, and is run at constant velocity v(accel = 0). You alsko know the time taken for this stretch. Can you not relate 100 - s to v and the time ?

You now have 3 equations in 3 unknowns. Solve them.
 
Last edited:
Oh sorry with these equations

100m - Sf = 1/2 * a * (2.10s) ^ 2
100m - Sf = 2.205A
A = (100m-Sf)/2.205

I meant Sf = The distance traveled in 2.10 seconds
But I just realized that even if I got the Acceleration from that, It would for after the 2.10 seconds. And I know that anyway. Since after 2.10 seconds they maintained the maximum speed the velocity must be increasing constantly and so the A must be 0.

Ok so that went out the window.

Now the equations that I can relate this three (distance s, the acceleration a, and the final velocity v) are

S = (Vf-vi) * delta t (since vi = 0, it's Vf * delta T )
S = 1/2 a delta t ^ 2
A = Vf * delta T

Now from the info on section 2, now I know that

100 - S = 1/2 a * delta t ^ 2 Or

100 - (vf * delta T) = 1/2 a * delta t ^ 2 or

100 - (Vf (10.2- 2.21) = 1/2 * a * 4.41

100 - (vf (7.99) = 2.205A

100 = 2.205A + Vf(7.99)

100 = 2.205A + A * (2.10) (7.99)

100 = 18.984A

A = 5.27 m/s/s

Yay, Thank you guys for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top