What was the rotational velocity of Earth on Dec 31, 1899

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the Earth's rotational velocity on December 31, 1899, which is significant because time is defined in relation to this date. The calculation involves dividing the length of the day by the Earth's rotation, revealing that the Earth rotated 360.9856 degrees in 24 hours. This results in a rotational velocity of approximately 0.004178 degrees per second or 15.041 degrees per hour. The conversation highlights the importance of precise measurements in timekeeping and Earth's rotation. Understanding these calculations is essential for accurate time definitions and standards.
Patrick Aberdeen
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
I ask because time is defined with reference to this day (the SI second is based on a caesium clock is calibrated with reference to the 1952 ephemeris time standard, which was based on a second being 1/86 400th of Jan 0, 1900 (with Jan 0 being Dec 31 of 1899).

So... how do I calculate the rotational velocity of Earth on that day?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Divide the length of the day by how far Earth rotated.

(hint: it isn't 360 degrees)
 
Right- of course! that's embarrassing :-p - thanks!

360.9856° / 86400 s = 0.004178°/s or 15.041°/hr

Thank you Russ
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

Velocity as a fundamental quantity.
Replies
3
Views
1K
I The Derivative Nature of Time and Its Relation to Earth's Rotation and Speed
Replies
38
Views
5K
I SI definition of second: what day/year is the reference year
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Time Measurement in Extremely Curved Space Regions
2
Replies
95
Views
7K
I Comparing Clock Rates in Accelerated vs Constant Velocity Frames
Replies
14
Views
2K
I Clock Thought Exp: A Light-Year Time Paradox
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Calculating Velocity: Moon Around Earth & Clocks in Burj Khalifa
Replies
3
Views
2K
Time Dilation & 2 Atomic Clocks (one in orbit)
Replies
3
Views
3K
What Happens to Time Zones When Flying at Earth's Rotation Speed?
Replies
9
Views
2K
GPS and Relativity: Impact of Time Dilation on Earth and Satellites
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top