What was the rotational velocity of Earth on Dec 31, 1899

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the Earth's rotational velocity on December 31, 1899, which is significant because time is defined in relation to this date. The calculation involves dividing the length of the day by the Earth's rotation, revealing that the Earth rotated 360.9856 degrees in 24 hours. This results in a rotational velocity of approximately 0.004178 degrees per second or 15.041 degrees per hour. The conversation highlights the importance of precise measurements in timekeeping and Earth's rotation. Understanding these calculations is essential for accurate time definitions and standards.
Patrick Aberdeen
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
I ask because time is defined with reference to this day (the SI second is based on a caesium clock is calibrated with reference to the 1952 ephemeris time standard, which was based on a second being 1/86 400th of Jan 0, 1900 (with Jan 0 being Dec 31 of 1899).

So... how do I calculate the rotational velocity of Earth on that day?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Divide the length of the day by how far Earth rotated.

(hint: it isn't 360 degrees)
 
Right- of course! that's embarrassing :-p - thanks!

360.9856° / 86400 s = 0.004178°/s or 15.041°/hr

Thank you Russ
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top