What will be the relativistic change in momentum?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the relativistic change in momentum of a falling object, given its momentum at two different times and the influence of gravity. Participants debate the correct approach to derive the final velocity (v1) from known parameters, emphasizing the challenge posed by the relativistic effects. They suggest using Newtonian gravity approximations and differential equations to simplify the problem. The conversation highlights the complexity of integrating relativistic principles with classical mechanics. Ultimately, the need for a precise understanding of relativistic momentum and gravitational effects is underscored.
gulsen
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
a falling object has a measured momentum p0 at t0 and p1 at t1 by an observer on ground. if p0, t0 and t1 are known,what will be the relativistic change in momentum?(assuming that only force affecting is gravity force)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gulsen said:
a falling object has a measured momentum p0 at t0 and p1 at t1 by an observer on ground. if p0, t0 and t1 are known,what will be the relativistic change in momentum?(assuming that only force affecting is gravity force)
I am assuming this is some kind of cosmic ray particle with relativistic energy.

I am a little beat tonight, but why would it not just be \Delta p = p_1 - p_0? You measure momentum in the same (earth) frame of reference both times:

p_0 = \gamma_0m_0v_0 and later:

p_1 = \gamma_1m_0v_1

AM
 
and that's the problem. v1 is unknown. we only know p0, t0 and t1, and a function gravity related to the distance r (say we know g(r) and m -- still GmM/r^2 in GR?). how do we derieve v1 from these?
 
The problem is nasty,to say the least.It's a standard problem in SR,so i assume (i'm not sure,i don't have the books) it can be encountered in classic texts like Wheeler's SR.

It's a relativistic particle in a Newtonian gravitational potential.It falls freely,so you can say that the accleration is constant and equal to "g"...Solve it or search for uniformly accelerated particle in SR...

Daniel.
 
Edit: Ignore this post for now... look at those below~

Yes, you can still use the Newtonian model for gravity. Just set up a differential equation

\frac{GM}{r^2} = \frac{d^2r}{dt^2}

with initial condition

\frac{dr}{dt}\biggr |_{t=0} = \frac{p_0}{m_0}

and solve for dr/dt, ie. the velocity, then use your solution to find the velocity at time t.

If you are allowed to make the approximation

\frac{d^2r}{dt^2} = g

where g is the acceleration at sea level, then the DE is much simpler.

Edit: Though I haven't though about it too much, you may actually have to use the g approximation unless you are also given r(0).
 
Last edited:
No,no,it's a relativistic particle.It has 4 momentum...

\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}(t)}{c^{2}}}} v(t)\right) = g

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
The derivative of momentum isn't acceleration. You mean

\frac{d}{dt} \left(\frac{ v(t)}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2(t)}{c^2}}}\right)=g

but other than that, you're actually probably right. It might expect you to use that form for the DE. Time to dig up SRT books~
 
Back
Top