Programs What's the Best Option? EE/CS Dual Major vs CE

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the distinctions between Computer Science (CS), Electrical Engineering (EE), and Computer Engineering (CE). CS focuses on the theoretical methods and algorithms that drive systems, while CE combines elements of both CS and EE, emphasizing the practical aspects of building and prototyping systems. The conversation suggests that CS majors may delve deeper into the theoretical "why" behind systems, whereas CE majors are more hands-on, focusing on the implementation and refinement of those systems. Common courses may overlap between these fields, but CE programs often include unique content that bridges both disciplines. Ultimately, the choice between these paths should align with one's interests in theory versus practical application.
Alex Eyfoqer
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm still exploring which field is for me, and to ask which is better would be pointless. So instead I want to know: what exactly is the difference between a Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Dual Major/Degree as opposed to a Computer Engineering Major?
I realize computer engineering is a blend of the two, but are there any specific bits of knowledge or courses that would be covered in a Computer Engineering program that would not commonly be found in either CS or EE? Vice Versa?
From your knowledge, are there any common courses exclusive to Computer Engineering programs, or do you simply share some classes with EE majors and other classes with CS majors?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A different approach would be to make a list of the sorts of jobs you would be most compatible with and where you feel you could enjoy excelling, more than the rest.

In simplistic terms;
CS is concerned with the "methods" needed to be employed by a system, to achieve the intended outcome.
CE is concerned with building and prototyping the "system" that is required by the above method.

Would you define yourself as being the type of person that thrives on knowing "Why" something works or must be designed a specific way, or are you more hands on and excel at building something to meet a predefined need?
 
  • Like
Likes Alex Eyfoqer
I guess I would be geared more on the "why" something works toward meeting a certain outcome. What would you suggest is a more appropriate route?
 
Imo,

Science is developing the theory that leads to the definition of the desired outcome, and understanding "why" you need "A" system to accomplish your goal. The system can grow into a working model to further refine the theory and deliverable outcomes that are more likely to be also desirable. Theories can also be adjusted more readily for other but comparable systems as they more reflect a concept than a physical "device". I quoted "A" system as the Science is more concerned with creating a single iteration of each workable system or device.

Engineering leans more to developing a working system or device in a way that is repeatable, efficient, and can consistently meet the requirements designed at the science stage. Repeatable in both; the system reaching the same level of accuracy and in being able to reproduce multiple iterations of each system, that will approach equality or improvement to the prototype.

Consider, building a robot, for example.
CS would function to determine what concepts the robot would have to calculate through in order to properly respond to their environment, then eventually build a robot that would respond in that way. It begins by defining ideal, then strives to build something that approaches ideal design.

CE would function to build a robot that calculates through various concepts, to respond to it's environment in some way, then fine tune those responses to eventually respond properly, according to the above. It begins by building something, redefining the design at each step what ideal should be, and improves the original device to be more ideal.

For my example of robotics then, if you like crafting the mathematical algorithms that determines the robots logic, CS is the better choice. If you more favor the mechanics or software coding of implementing those algorithms, CE would be the better choice.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top