Wheel speed at tyre compared to at the centre

  • Thread starter Thread starter tony two takes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed Wheel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating wheel speed and the relationship between wheel diameter, RPM, and distance traveled. A 2m diameter wheel at 30 RPM covers approximately 5.64 km/h, illustrating that larger wheels require lower RPM for the same speed due to increased distance per rotation. The impact of wheel size on gearing ratios is emphasized, with larger wheels allowing for greater gearing options. Additionally, the conversation touches on the importance of recalibrating speedometers and odometers when changing tire sizes, as this affects mileage readings. Understanding the mechanics of gear pairs and torque relationships is crucial for achieving desired RPM and speed outputs.
tony two takes
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
does anyone know the formula for calculating the speed a wheel has to be traveling to cover a certain amount of rotations within a minute eg 30rpm,

if 2m diameter implies a 3.142 perimeter (x 30)
therefore do the wheels move at 94 meters p m (x 60 minutes , in time)
= 5.64 kmph or 3.5 mph? essentially small wheels to require faster speed hence gearing etc
? if yes does anyone have a simpler calculation?

Also the calculation to turn an item such as a water wheel different size for different torques on the crank shaft

The leverage required at different size to achieve a desired rpm at different levels of torque?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For two wheels turning at the same rate, i.e. RPM is constant, the wheel with the larger diameter will roll farther in the same amount of time than the wheel with the smaller diameter.

So, if you take the stock 13" wheels and tires off your ride and replace them with 22" rims, you will either run the engine at a lower RPM (easy) to go 60 mph, or you'll have to change the final drive ratio in the drive train (a little harder). Also, the odometer and the speedometer are driven by a gear mounted in the transmission and this gear is calibrated for a certain tire size. If you increase the tire size, the mileage reading on the odometer will be off, as will the reading on the speedometer, so be sure to tell the traffic cop this if you get pulled over for speeding.
 
yeah i get what you mean ground it covers would be more due to larger area etc, so larger wheels a larger distance so if the size changes the speed of the wheel and the distance it covers is altered due to requiring more rpm to travel a certain distance, tyre sizes change yet one rotation is measured and calculated etc

So irrespective of the size of the wheel etc the main i thing is rpm and therefore to get a certain desired speed thing coming from the wheel, essentilly the alrger the wheel allows for a greater gearing later, eg 2m increase the gearing to the lower therefor increased speed

do you know hot to calculate gearing ratios? eg 2m diameter requires 200 rpm at output there the gearing has to change 30 rpm to 2000,

just found the below calculation in regards to generating eg pairing to get the desired out put, yet to calculate it etc, but in regards to the radians do you know if, as its divided by time after diameter x 2 x pie is per 60 seconds. hour etc

The shape of the gear teeth are the some on both the input and output gears, and thus the larger gear has more teeth on it. The Pitch distance, Pd, is the distance between gears. Thus the number of teeth on the gear, n, times the Pitch is equal to the circumference of the gear. Accordingly,

Pd nin = 2 p rin

Pd nout = 2 p rout

nin/ nout = rin/ rout

The gear pair is analyzed with the following assumptions:

Quasi-static analysis (it is assumed that the gears are rotating at a constant speed, and thus acceleration torques can be neglected)

Frictional losses are neglected (friction can be significant, and should be considered separately!)

The gear teeth mesh with each other (no jumping of gears!)

Since there are no frictional losses, the input and output power can be set equal to each other as:

Pin = tin win

Pout = tout wout

tin win = tout wout

We now need to consider the relative velocity of the two gears, which is determined by the meshing of the teeth. Since the teeth mesh, we know that the same number of teeth must mesh from both gears. For each revolution of the input gear the following number of teeth pass through the mesh area, where nrevin is the number of revolutions of the input gear:

number of teeth that mesh = nrevin 2 p rin / Pd

Applying the same equation to the output gear, and setting the number of meshed teeth equal to each other provides:

nrevout 2 p rout / Pd = nrevin 2 p rin / Pd

The above equation simplifies to:

nrevout / nrevin = rin / rout

If we multiple the number of revolutions by 2p, we get the angle of rotation of both gears in radians, which gives:

rin dqin = rout dqout

If we divide the angle of rotation by time, dt, then we get the ratios of angular velocities in radians per second

wout / win = rin / rout

An alternative interpretation is that the angular velocity at the mesh point is the same for both gears. Since velocity of a point on a rotating object is given by rw. The velocity equality at the mesh point is given by:

rin win = rout wout

And we see that the two previous equations are identical.

Since the radius of a gear is proportional to the number of teeth, the velocity relationship can be given in terms on numbers of teeth on the input and output gears. Simply substitute into the above equation that nPd=2pr for both gears, to give:

wout / win = nin / nout

We can now combine the power equation with the velocity equation to get the ratio of input and output torques:

tin win = tout wout (power equation)

tout / tin = win / wout

tout / tin = rout / rin (substituting in velocity relationship)

Thus when the input gear is smaller than the output gear:

The output torque is higher than the input torque

The output velocity is lover than the input velocity (i.e. the smaller gear needs to make more revolutions than the larger gear)

In Summary

The fundamental equations for a gear pair are:

tin win = tout wout (power equality)

wout / win = rin / rout (velocity relationship in terms of radiuses)

wout / win = nin / nout (velocity relationship in terms of number of teeth)

tout / tin = rout / rin (torque relationship in terms of radiuses)

tout / tin = nout / nin (torque relationship in terms of number of teeth)

http://maelabs.ucsd.edu/mae_guides/machine_design/machine_design_basics/Mech_Ad/mech_ad.htm
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top