When a diver enters a pool after a dive and stops

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neohm
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In analyzing the work-energy theorem for a diver stopping in water, the equation Wnet = Change in K is established, where Wg (work done by gravity) and Q (work done by water resistance) are considered. Both Wg and Q can be treated as negative since they oppose the diver's motion, but their signs depend on the chosen coordinate system. The diver's kinetic energy becomes zero upon stopping, and potential energy is also zero at the water's surface, leading to K=0. The forces of gravity and water resistance cancel each other out, resulting in the diver coming to a stop. Understanding the signs of these forces is crucial for accurate calculations in the context of the diver's motion.
Neohm
When a diver enters a pool after a dive and stops in the water after 5 meters, how is the work/energy theorm set up?

I said Wnet = Change in K, so
Wg + Q = K,

where Wg is the work done by gravity, mgh, and Q is the work done by the resistance of the water. Are Wg and Q negative (-Wg - Q = K), since they are in the opposite direction of motion, and oppose the divers motion when he hits the water? Or can they be added becuase they are both negative work? Oh, and is positive or negative 5 meters used in the calculations?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as you keep them consistent it doesn't matter what is positive and what is negative for the forces. For the sake of logic, I'd use a force working against you as being negative. And distance is an absolute value, its always positive. So your Q will be a negative number, and you add it.

Also, since the diver stops, he has no kinetic energy and since the surface of the water is our zero altitude, no potential enegy, so k=0.

Also, what about the work done by the diver's legs? Are you assuming a stiff-legged fall forward.

Anyway:

Wg+Q=K=0
Are Wg and Q negative (-Wg - Q = K)
Remember, putting a negative sign in front of a variable doesn't make the variable negative - in fact it doesn't tell you anything at all about the sign of the variable. It just means in your equation you are reversing its sign.
 
What is negative and what is positive depends upon how you set up your coordinate system. Assuming you set up so that positive is upward, then the force of gravity is negative because it is downward- not because it is "the opposite direction of motion". You can say that the resistance of the water is negative because it is opposite to the motion but that's a "factor" that has to be multiplied by the speed through the water (no speed, no resistance), not the force itself. Since the dive is downward, the resistance force itself is (negative times negative) positive. The two forces cancel- that's why the diver comes to a stop.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top