When are work and heat calculated by differences in enthelpy or internal energy

Yellow Fang
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This is not exactly homework, but I'm not sure it belongs in any other section either. I've been reading through Applied Thermodynamics for Engineering Technologists by Eastop & McConkey. In general it's pretty good I think. However, in the first few chapters, it explained that Q+W = U2-U1, i.e. Heat plus work equals the difference in internal energy (in steam). Then I got to the chapter on steam cycles where it started calculating heat and work in differences in enthalpy. I haven't really got to the bottom of why this is. I know that enthalpy is internal energy plus the product of pressure and volume (h = u + pv). I looked up one book in the library which referred to 'shaft work' when work is done with no change in pressure, but I can't see how this could apply with a turbine because there in change in pressure during the compression and expansion processes.

It seems that enthalpies are used for calculations where mass flow is involved, and that the equation in question is

m(u1 + v12/2 + gh1 + p1v1) + Q + W = m(u2 + v22/2 + gh2 + p2v2)

Am I along the right lines? Would Q+W=U2-U1 still apply for a reciprocating steam engine?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q+W=U2-U1 is applicable when you have a system (fixed mass). For a control volume (or open system) the correct energy balance is Q+W=H2-H1 .
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top