When calculating the momentum expectation value

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
when calculating the momentum expectation value the term i(h-bar)d/dx goes inbetween the complex PSI and the 'normal' PSI, so do you differentiate the normal PSI and then multiply by the complex PSI? or do you differentiate the product of the two PSI's i.e. the modulus of PSI?

thanks for any direction on this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rwooduk said:
when calculating the momentum expectation value the term i(h-bar)d/dx goes inbetween the complex PSI and the 'normal' PSI, so do you differentiate the normal PSI and then multiply by the complex PSI?

Yes. The expectation value of ##\hat A## is ##\int \Psi^* \hat A \Psi \, dx## where any differential operators in ##\hat A## works to the right.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Another hint:
\hat{p}=-\mathrm{i} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} x}.
Note the sign!
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Brilliant! Many Thanks CC!

vanhees71 said:
Another hint:
\hat{p}=-\mathrm{i} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} x}.
Note the sign!

hm, not sure what you're getting at, the negative sign just comes to the front of the integral, I am probably missing something. but thanks also!
 
I just wanted to make sure that you get that sign right, because you got it wrong in your original posting!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top