When can using a logarithm make solving an equation easier?

AI Thread Summary
Using logarithms can simplify solving equations by transforming multiplicative relationships into additive ones, which is particularly useful in differentiation. In the discussed physics problem, the oscillation time of a weight on a steel wire is analyzed through logarithmic differentiation, revealing how temperature changes affect wire length and oscillation time. The method allows for quick calculations of fractional changes, though it may be confusing for those unfamiliar with it. While the traditional differentiation approach yields the same results, logarithmic differentiation can sometimes provide faster solutions. Understanding when to apply this technique can enhance problem-solving efficiency in similar scenarios.
bolzano95
Messages
89
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Well, there is a physics problem I was solving and it is really interesting how it is officially solved.

We take a small weight and hang it on a steel wire. For how much does the oscillation time change if the temperature of this wire raises for 10K?

I looked up solution and it is solved like this:

Homework Equations


The weight on the steel wire is like a mathematical pendulum.
Therefore ##t_0 = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{L}{g}}##. Now logarithm and differentiate:
## ln {t_0} = ln {2\pi} + 1/2 ln {L} -1/2 ln{g}## and after differentiation
##\frac{dt_0}{t_0}= \frac{1}{2} \frac{dL}{L}##.

Because of the temperature change ##dt## the steel wire is longer for ##dL =\alpha L dT##.
The relative change of oscillation time is then ## \frac{dt_0}{t_0}= \frac{1}{2} \alpha dT##.

The Attempt at a Solution


In my solution process there was nothing of logarithms or differentiation. Of course my result was also false. But I am not interested in where I did a mistake, there is more important question her:

What is this special new solving approach? It is the first time I see solving it and it frustrates me, because I don't understand the logic behind it.
When can I use it in the future? Also from where does it come?
P.S Even in my wildest dreams I would not use this solving method.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's only a quick way to get the fractional change of variable ##x## which is ##\frac{dx}{x}##. You could have obtained the same result by plain differentiation.

For example in this case you would do $$dt_0=\frac{2\pi}{\sqrt{g}}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{L}}dL$$Then divide by ##t_0## or multiply by ##t_0^{-1} ~## to get$$\frac{dt_0}{t_0}=\frac{2\pi}{\sqrt{g}}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{L}}dL\times \frac{\sqrt{g}}{2\pi\sqrt{L}}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{dL}{L}.$$

For whatever it's worth, this is the first time I see the logarithmic method for doing this. If it's confusing you, don't use it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman
There is a technique called Logarithmic differentiation, which is applied here. It sometimes leads to answer faster as in this case. Of course the answer should be same regardless of whether it is used or not.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top