When conservation does not apply

  • Thread starter Thread starter pakmingki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apply Conservation
AI Thread Summary
Conservation of angular momentum applies when no net torque is present; otherwise, the relationship between initial and final angular momentum changes. When a net torque is applied, it alters the angular momentum over time, similar to how linear force affects linear momentum. For systems experiencing external torque, the equation Initial L + delta L = Final L is used, where delta L represents the change in angular momentum. Understanding the time duration of the applied torque is crucial for calculating this change. Conservation laws are only valid in isolated systems without external influences.
pakmingki
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
im just talking in general about conservation of linear momentum, angular momentum, mechanical energy, etc.

So, for angular momentum, if angular momentum is constant, then initial angular momentum = final angular momentum.

But, what if there is a net torque? How do you take that into account when calculating the final angular momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's quite analogous to linear momentum and linear force. When a torque is applied over a certain amount of time, it adds angular momentum. For example, imagine pedaling a bicycle. The motion of the wheels remains mostly constant, then once you start pedaling it speeds up, increasing angular momentum.

In general, torque can be thought of as a rate of change in angular momentum.
 
Conservation laws only work for isolated systems. If there is an external force or torque for example, conservation of momentum does not apply.

For the case where there is an external torque, then;

Initial L + delta L = Final (L)

To find delta L (change in angular momentum) you need to know the time over which the torque was applied.

Claude.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top