When do quantum effects become important?

AI Thread Summary
Quantum effects become significant in gravitational calculations at extremely small length scales, specifically below 1 x 10^-35 meters. This conclusion is derived from dimensional analysis involving Planck's constant (\hbar) and the gravitational constant (G). By combining these constants and the speed of light (c), the analysis reveals that quantum effects are tied to the behavior of these fundamental constants. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding how to manipulate these dimensions to arrive at meaningful conclusions. The participant seeks confirmation of their calculations, indicating a learning process in dimensional analysis.
andyfry
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
At what length scale do quantum effects become important in gravitational calculations??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can figure this out from a scaling argument. The gravitational constant, G, has dimensions of (length)3(mass)-1(time)-2 or, in shorthand, L3M-1T-2. The speed of light, c, is the universal conversion between time and distance, since it has units of LT-1.

Finally, quantum effects are characterized by Planck's constant h, or more commonly used \hbar, which has units of L2M T-1. If \hbar were zero, quantum effects would not exist, so in the limit that \hbar \rightarrow 0, the length scale where quantum effects becomes important must also go to zero. So our length scale must depend on \hbar to a positive power.

Can you see how to combine \hbar and G to eliminate the mass scale? How about how to combine powers of c with the result to convert time to length units?
 
Yeah, this was what I was trying to do! Thought i had solved it correctly and was just looking for confirmation. However I've now noticed I got a few dimensions confused. I'll try again...
Multiplying G and \hbar gives dimensions of L5T-3.
c-3 will have dimensions L-3T-3 (I believe?)
So multiplying by this gives dimensions L2
Looking at the indices (10-34*10-11(108)-3) gives a magnitute of 10-69 for L2.
So quantum effects must be taken into account below 1*10-35m!
I hope that was right... :S Dimensional analysis is pretty new to me!
 
Pretty sure this is correct.
Would be great if someone could just confirm please?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top