When Do We Use Each SHM Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter negation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Shm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the differences between two equations used in simple harmonic motion (SHM) and wave mechanics. The first equation, y(x,t) = A sin(ωt - ø), represents SHM and focuses on time, while the second equation, y2(x,t) = A sin(kx - ωt), describes wave behavior and incorporates spatial variables. It is noted that the wave number k relates to the number of cycles per unit distance, and 2π/k gives the wavelength, not the period. The term vt in the second equation indicates the distance traveled by the wave over time, and it is equated to the phase shift ø. Understanding when to use each equation depends on whether the focus is on time-dependent motion or wave propagation characteristics.
negation
Messages
817
Reaction score
0
Let's say there are 2 equations: (1) y(x,t) = A sin (ωt - ø) and (2) y2(x,t) = A sin (kx - vt)

When are we interested in one over the other? Obviously, (1) tells us that y is represented in terms of ωt( 2πt/T) and ø. Whereas, (2) produces an equation stating the wave number, k(I tend to look at k as the number of cycles/2π) and if we take 2π/k, we obtain the period, T.
vt gives us the shift/ distance as a function of the speed of the wave and the time over which it travels. vt is also really just ø, isn't it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second equation is actually a wave equation while the first is just a SHM equation - there is no x on the right hand side of the first equation. The 2nd equation should actually be written 2(x,t) = A sin (kx - ωt). 2π/k is actually the wavelength, not the period. ø is just an arbitrary constant phase. ωt cannot be identified with a constant phase since it is a function of time.
 
Back
Top