When does a Geodesic Represent a Free-Falling Particle's Worldline?

deadringer
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
"Under what conditions does a geodesic represent a possible wordline for a particle in free fall, parametrized by proper time."

I can only think of one conditions - the fact that the metric ds squared is positive. Is this enough?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Possibly something like, "if acted on by no nongravitational forces". GR only absorbs gravitational forces into the metric. Though possibly that violates the condition of 'free fall'.
 
Last edited:
Nope. I think you are basically right to begin with. 'Free fall' should exclude nongravitational forces. But I think the condition that they might be looking for is that the particle is massive. Otherwise proper time=0 is quite acceptable.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top