When Does the Specific Heat of Free Electrons Surpass the Lattice Specific Heat?

steph_mil
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At what temperature T does the specific heat of the free electrons become larger than the specific heat of the lattice? Express T in terms of the Debye temperature and the electron concentration. Calculate T for copper (Debye = 343 K).


Homework Equations


Unfortunately, I have a ton of equations but have no clue which one to use. There are different equations for low and high temperatures, so I'm not sure where to start with this problem.


The Attempt at a Solution


Once I have the first part, I can solve for T for copper. I think I'm supposed to use some equations involving heat capacity and temperature, but no clue which one? Any hints may help! My book (Kittel's intro to solid state) is not helping...

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm assuming this is being done in the low temperature limit, where the total (constant volume) heat capacity of the metal goes as c_v = \alpha T + \gamma T^3, where the linear term corresponds to the electrons and the cubic term corresponds to the lattice (phonons). (In the high temperature limit both capacities, per particle, should be the same, making for a much less interesting problem!) I'm assuming you have what \alpha and \gamma are in your list of equations - I can't remember what they are, but the debye temperature is buried in \gamma, and presumably the electron concentration is buried in \alpha.

Anyways, from there it's a simple matter: determine when \alpha T/(\gamma T^3) = \alpha/(\gamma T^2) > 1.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top