When electric field resolve into components.

AI Thread Summary
Electric fields are vector fields characterized by both direction and magnitude, which necessitates resolving them into components for analysis. This approach simplifies calculations, especially in complex scenarios involving multiple forces or directions. However, it is not mandatory; problems can be solved without component resolution if the method is effective. Ignoring components may lead to oversights in directionality, potentially affecting accuracy in certain contexts. Ultimately, resolving electric fields into components is a useful technique, but not an absolute requirement for problem-solving.
vinzie
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Whenever I check a problem to find electric intensity at a point, it shows electricity at that particular point is resolved into components. Might be my question is a dumb one.
But seriously I wana know why does it resolved into components?
What happens if we do not care about the resolved components of electric field and go ahead and find the solution?

Thanks in advance!
Vinzie :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
E is a field, a vector field that has direction and magnitude. You have to have direction and direction can be separated into coordinate components. It can be xyz, r\phi z, or Rθ\phi.
 
vinzie said:
Hi,

Whenever I check a problem to find electric intensity at a point, it shows electricity at that particular point is resolved into components. Might be my question is a dumb one.
But seriously I wana know why does it resolved into components?
What happens if we do not care about the resolved components of electric field and go ahead and find the solution?

Thanks in advance!
Vinzie :)

You don't have to do it that way. It's just a very convenient way of working our some problems. If you can solve a particular problem without resolving, then go ahead and do it. No worries.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top