When Is L(S ∩ T) Not Equal to L(S) ∩ L(T)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrapMuzik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
TrapMuzik
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Okay, so for the problem before this, I proved that L(S ∩ T ) ⊂ L(S ) ∩ L(T ).

For this problem, I have to give an example where L(S ∩ T ) ̸= L(S ) ∩ L(T ).

So I'm thinking that there are going to be elements in L(S) intersect L(T) that are not in the span of S intersect T. In what sort of case would this happen? I'm not sure what direction to go in.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Figured it out! Never mind
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top