When should I consider the sign of charges when applying Coulomb's Law?

AI Thread Summary
When applying Coulomb's Law, the sign of the charges indicates the nature of the force: a negative result signifies attraction, while a positive result indicates repulsion. It is essential to determine the direction and magnitude of the force separately, using a sketch to visualize the charges and their interactions. The magnitude can be calculated using Coulomb's Law without considering the signs of the charges. Ultimately, the sign convention can be flexible, as long as the direction of the force is clearly defined. Understanding these concepts helps clarify when to consider charge signs in calculations.
panther1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am studying Physics Vol2 by halliday, resnick and krane. I was attempting the coloumb force exercises..If we put one charge negative and other positive in the formula..then the force comes out to be negative but the instructor manual for the book ignores the negative charge, and take it as positive, then the force comes out as positive...what I want to ask is when do I put negative charge with the force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Same force acts on both the objects.If one object is positive and other is negative then then both come towards each other.Now take a direction as positive let it be right(positive x direction probable you can take reverse but i took like this).let + charge be on- x-axis and - charge on + right axis.say both are equal in magnitude.then they both attract towards origin.so now say where the force is positive and where negative now the + charge move towards +x axis and - charge towards - x axis.Hence this concludes that force on + charge is positive(it is according to our convention) and negative charge is negative.Basically you can get opposite it is all according to sign convention you can take it as your wish.So we need to ignore charge for calculating force.
 
When determining any vector quantity, it is a good practice to determine the direction and magnitude separately.

As norhh correctly states, find the direction of the force depending on the signs of hte charges. Don't rely on your memory either; draw a sketch, clearly showing q1 and q2, and force arrows showing the direction of force on each.

Then apply Coulomb's Law formula to determine the magnitude of force, ignoring the sign of the charges.

Technically, if you do put in the charge signs, a negative result to Coulomb's Law is defined as an attractive force, while positive forces are repulsive. Either way they do not indicate the absolute direction, just "toward" or "away from" the other charge.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top