When Should the Spaceship's Engines Be Turned Off?

bodensee9
Messages
166
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The position function of a spaceship is

r(t) = (3+t)i + (2+ln t)j + (7 - 4/(t^2+1)k and the coordinates of the space station are (6,4,9). If the spaceship were to "coast" into the space station, when should the engines be turned off?


Homework Equations



The relevant equations are r' = velocity, and r'' = acceleration.

The Attempt at a Solution



I am really not sure how to go about solving this problem. So, this means that r" is zero but then there is still velocity? So, if r' is i + 1/tj + 8t/(t^2+1)^2k. r" = -1/t^2 + (8(t^2+1)^4 - 16t^2(t^2+1))/(t^2+1)^4. But then I am not sure what to do after that. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bodensee9 said:

Homework Statement


The position function of a spaceship is

r(t) = (3+t)i + (2+ln t)j + (7 - 4/(t^2+1)k and the coordinates of the space station are (6,4,9). If the spaceship were to "coast" into the space station, when should the engines be turned off?
Am I correct that that r(t) is the position of the spacecraft with the engines on? And with the engines off it will continue in that direction?


Homework Equations



The relevant equations are r' = velocity, and r'' = acceleration.

The Attempt at a Solution



I am really not sure how to go about solving this problem. So, this means that r" is zero but then there is still velocity? So, if r' is i + 1/tj + 8t/(t^2+1)^2k. r" = -1/t^2 + (8(t^2+1)^4 - 16t^2(t^2+1))/(t^2+1)^4. But then I am not sure what to do after that. Thanks!

Yes, with the engines turned of the spaceship will still have non zero velocity. Look at the velocity vector for each t (the derivative of r) as well as the vector from r(t) directly to the space station. When those vectors are parallel, turn off the engines will cause the spaceship to continue to the space station.
 
So do you mean that if the vector formed by subtracting r(t) from (6,4,9) needs to be parallel to r'? So this means that <3-t, 2-ln t, 2+4/t^2+1> needs to be a multiple of <i, 1/tj, 8t/(t^2+1)^2k?

But how do you go about solving for that, because you have 3-t must be a multiple of i, and 2-ln t must be a multiple of 1/t? So does that mean you try to make ln t go away? Thanks.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top