When tan theta is -ve why did we assume that it's in the second quad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Douna2nd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tan Theta
Douna2nd
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
The problem says
" Two forces of magnitudes 12 and 15 Newton are applied to a point and the tangesnt of the angle between them is -3/4. Find the resultant of the two forces and the measure of its angle of inclination on the first force.
In the answer it says that the theta belongs to the second quad, and I assume this is because the tan -ve but why didn't it assume it's in the fourth quad? And why doess the -ve sign belong to the 4 on the x-axis not the 3 on the y-axis??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Douna2nd! :smile:
Douna2nd said:
" … the tangesnt of the angle between them is -3/4"

In the answer it says that the theta belongs to the second quad, and I assume this is because the tan -ve but why didn't it assume it's in the fourth quad?

Because the convention is we always take the "principal value" for arctan, and that's between 0 and π (ie, 1st or 2nd quadrant).
And why doess the -ve sign belong to the 4 on the x-axis not the 3 on the y-axis??

Not following you. :confused:
 
Douna2nd said:
And why doess the -ve sign belong to the 4 on the x-axis not the 3 on the y-axis??

tiny-tim said:
Not following you. :confused:

That's because -ve is baby-talk for "negative".
 
Two rays, starting at the same point, create two angles, one less than or equal to 180 degrees, the other larger than or equal to (and the two angles add to 360 degrees). The angle created is, by definition, the smaller of the two.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top