When to use double and when to use triple bonds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kabigon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonds
AI Thread Summary
Understanding when to use double versus triple bonds involves recognizing the valence electrons available for bonding. In CH2O, carbon forms a double bond with oxygen because it has two remaining valence electrons after bonding with two hydrogen atoms. In contrast, HCN features a triple bond between carbon and nitrogen, with nitrogen having one lone pair remaining. The key is to assess the number of valence electrons and how many bonds are needed to satisfy the octet rule for each atom. This approach helps clarify the appropriate bonding structure for different molecules.
Kabigon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I seemed to be confuse when to use double and triple bonds. For example, take CH2O and HCN. How do you know if you can use a triple or a double bond on the carbon and oxygen for CH2O? I know the correct answer is a double bond, with two lone pairs on the oxygen. And for HCN, it is a triple bond on the carbon and nitrogen with only one lone pair on the nitrogen.

But how do you know when to use a triple or double? I am very confused.. is there a rule to know when you can use a double bond, and leave two lone pairs hanging out, or a triple bond with only one lone pair? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well consider the CH2O molecule. The carbon has four free electrons in its outer shell and 2 of those are used with the 2 Hydrogen atoms so it only has 2 bonds left and so forms a double bond with the oxygen. I hope this simple explanation has clarrified things.
 
Oh. I'm so stupid. I almost forgot about that part. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top