Where Am I Going Wrong in Sakurai's Quantum Spin Eigenvalue Problem?

Theage
Messages
11
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I am currently working on a seemingly straightforward eigenvalue problem appearing as problem 1.8 in Sakurai's Modern QM. He asks us to find an eigenket \vert\vec S\cdot\hat n;+\rangle with \vec S\cdot\hat n\vert\vec S\cdot\hat n;+\rangle = \frac\hbar 2\vert\vec S\cdot\hat n;+\rangle where the unit vector n is defined by polar angle alpha and azimuthal angle beta.

Homework Equations



The definitions of the Pauli sigma matrices, along with the formula \hat n = (\sin\alpha\cos\beta,\sin\alpha\sin\beta,\cos\alpha) for conversion to Cartesian coordinates.

The Attempt at a Solution



\vec S\cdot\hat n = \frac\hbar 2\sin\alpha\cos\beta\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}+\sin\alpha\sin\beta\begin{pmatrix}0&-i\\i&0\end{pmatrix}+\cos\alpha\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix} = \frac\hbar 2\begin{pmatrix}\cos\alpha&\sin\alpha e^{-i\beta}\\\sin\alpha e^{i\beta}&-\cos\alpha\end{pmatrix}. Thus we have the \lambda=1 eigenvalue problem for the matrix \begin{pmatrix}\cos\alpha&e^{-i\beta}\sin\alpha\\e^{i\beta}\sin\alpha&-\cos\alpha\end{pmatrix}. This becomes the system of equations \begin{pmatrix}x\\y\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}x\cos\alpha+ye^{-i\beta}\sin\alpha-x\\-y\cos\alpha+xe^{i\beta}\sin\alpha-y\end{pmatrix}. Thus beta appears to be completely arbitrary, and alpha = n*pi, however this appears to have no solutions as we get cosines equaling 2 which is nonsense. The characteristic polynomial predicts a lambda=1 eigenvalue - where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Theage said:
Thus we have the \lambda=1 eigenvalue problem for the matrix \begin{pmatrix}\cos\alpha&e^{-i\beta}\sin\alpha\\e^{i\beta}\sin\alpha&-\cos\alpha\end{pmatrix}.
This looks good to me.

This becomes the system of equations \begin{pmatrix}x\\y\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}x\cos\alpha+ye^{-i\beta}\sin\alpha-x\\-y\cos\alpha+xe^{i\beta}\sin\alpha-y\end{pmatrix}.

I don't understand your matrix on the right hand side. How did you get the ##-x## and the ##-y## terms on the far right of the matrix?

##\alpha## and ##\beta## are fixed by the choice of ##\hat{n}##. You need to find ##x## and ##y##.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top