Where are carbo-cations formed in this nucleophilic substitution reaction?

AI Thread Summary
Carbocations are formed during the nucleophilic substitution reaction when HBr is added, with hydrogen attacking the double bonds to create the most stable carbocation. The stability of these carbocations depends on whether the carbons at the ends of the double bonds are primary, secondary, or tertiary. After determining the positions of hydrogen and bromine, the reaction proceeds to a second step involving nucleophilic substitution with methoxide ions. Understanding the roles of these ions is crucial for grasping the overall reaction mechanism. The discussion clarifies the formation of carbocations and the subsequent steps in the reaction process.
Oblivion77
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


xctxsl.png

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm confused on what is happening in this reaction, and where carbo-cations are being formed. Any help would be great. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What would you expect to happen in the first step, when HBr is added?
 
PhaseShifter said:
What would you expect to happen in the first step, when HBr is added?

Well The H would attack the double bonds and form the most stable carbo-cation?
 
Correct. So what remains is determining whether the ends of each double bond are primary, secondary, or tertiary carbons to determine the relative stabilities of carbocations.

Once you know where the hydrogen and bromine go, you move on to the second step, which is a nucleophilic substitution using methoxide ions.
 
PhaseShifter said:
Correct. So what remains is determining whether the ends of each double bond are primary, secondary, or tertiary carbons to determine the relative stabilities of carbocations.

Once you know where the hydrogen and bromine go, you move on to the second step, which is a nucleophilic substitution using methoxide ions.

Thanks for the help, I understand the first step and where the bromine's attach to. What exactly is happening in the second step with the methoxide ions?
 
Nucleophilic substitution.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top