Where are the points?Where are the points?

sam.
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 10.0 nC charge is located at position (x, y) = (1.0 cm, 2.0 cm). At what (x, y) position(s) is the electric field
a. -225,000i N/C
b. (161,000i + 80,500j) N/C
c. (28,800i + 21,600j) N/C

Homework Equations



E = (1/4\pi\epsilon)(q/r^2)
F = Kq_1q_2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



With a) I used the Pythagorean theorem to find r^2 using (x, y) which is squareroot 5. However, I'm not exactly sure where this gets me. I honestly have no clue as to where to start with this question and any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sam. said:
With a) I used the Pythagorean theorem to find r^2 using (x, y) which is squareroot 5. However, I'm not exactly sure where this gets me. I honestly have no clue as to where to start with this question and any help would be greatly appreciated!

I think you probably ought to show that calculation. I get for part (a) that the distance from the charge is 2 cm.

In each part, use the field magnitude to find the radius of the circle centered on the 10 nC charge on which the point could be found. You will want to make a picture of the way the field points. Since the charge is positive, the field points outward from it; where would the "test point" need to be on each circle in order to have those field vector components? (The direction can be found by the appropriate use of trigonometry.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top