Where Can I Find a Quick Start Guide for Learning Category Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter matness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Suggestion
matness
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
I am only familiar to undergrad abstract algebra and want to learn category theory.
which book or website do you suggest for a quick start?
thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So before I give any suggestions, you should know that I probably have less of a background in algebra than you and also haven't yet learned much Category Theory (but I work on it sometimes in my free time).

A while ago, I started a topic where I asked a similar question and did some reading through some books before picking one to start learning from.

The standard text on Category Theory is MacLane's Categories for the Working Mathematician, but it assumes that you're already familiar with a lot of algebra. In particular, I believe that it assumes some knowledge of algebraic topology.

Goldblatt has a book titled Topoi: The Categorical Analysis of Logic. It builds up all of the basic category theory and eventually covers a good deal. It also covers some basic topoi theory. It assumes that you have a fair grasp of undergrad algebra (but it is not necessary that you do).
Additionally, you can read the book for free here: http://historical.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/cul.math/docviewer?did=Gold010&seq=&view=75&frames=0&pagenum=
(Although I don't have a link to Goldblatt's website at this moment, the above link is on his website)
The only problem that I've noticed with the book is that it doesn't seem to have many examples of applications of the earlier ideas. It mainly builds up the basics so that it can get to Topos Theory
That is the book that I am working through at the moment.
 
Why do you want to learn category theory? If you just want to learn it for the sake of learning it, I think it will be tough to digest it without having more background than you mentioned. Despite what some people may think, category theory's purpose is for applications to other math (like algebraic geometry and algebraic topology) and not abstraction for its own sake.

It might be better to start with some homological algebra or algebraic topology so that the stuff you see will be motivated.
 
masnevets said:
Why do you want to learn category theory?.

Because in algebraic geometry lots of things are explained in terms of categories and functors.Not want deeply learning this stuff but understanding when it is used in definitions thm s etc.
 
All the category theory I know (which is not a lot), I learned from chapters I and X of Hungerford's Algebra. It sounds like these two chapters (well, section and a chapter!) will be good enough for you too.
 
matness said:
Because in algebraic geometry lots of things are explained in terms of categories and functors.Not want deeply learning this stuff but understanding when it is used in definitions thm s etc.

In that case, I think the best way to learn category theory is to try and prove some of the things yourself and work out a bunch of examples. I never really understood what a natural transformation was until I was assigned Yoneda's lemma on a problem set. This might not be a bad way to go. In the process I think you would pick up a lot of valuable definitions.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top